Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Kemzyme((R)) Plus Dry (endo-1,3(4)-beta-glucanase, endo-1,4-beta-glucanase, alpha-amylase, bacillolysin and endo-1,4-beta-xylanase) for poultry, ornamental birds and piglets (weaned) EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP)

被引:0
作者
Aquilina, Gabriele [1 ]
Bampidis, Vasileios [1 ]
Bastos, Maria de Lourdes [1 ]
Bories, Georges [1 ]
Chesson, Andrew [1 ]
Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro [1 ]
Fernandez-Cruz, Maria Luisa [1 ]
Flachowsky, Gerhard [1 ]
Gropp, Juergen [1 ]
Kolar, Boris [1 ]
Kouba, Maryline [1 ]
Puente, Secundino Lopez [1 ]
Lopez-Alonso, Marta [1 ]
Mantovani, Alberto [1 ]
Mayo, Baltasar [1 ]
Ramos, Fernando [1 ]
Rychen, Guido [1 ]
Saarela, Maria [1 ]
Villa, Roberto Edoardo [1 ]
Wallace, Robert John [1 ]
Wester, Pieter [1 ]
机构
[1] European Food Safety Author EFSA, Parma, Italy
关键词
zootechnical additive; digestibility enhancers; safety; efficacy; poultry; piglets;
D O I
10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4234
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Kemzyme (R) Plus Dry is a preparation of four glycosyl hydrolases and a protease which is to be used as a feed additive for poultry, ornamental birds and weaned piglets. Based on the tolerance studies provided, the Panel considered that the additive is safe for chickens and turkeys for fattening and laying hens at the maximum dose of 1 000 mg additive/kg feed and in weaned piglets at a maximum dose of 500 mg additive/kg feed. The conclusion can be extended/extrapolated to avian species at the same dose. The Panel concluded that the additive is safe for consumers. The additive is not irritant to skin or eyes but should be regarded as a potential skin sensitiser and as hazardous by inhalation. No risks to the environment are expected and no further environmental risk assessment is required. Owing to the lack of data, the efficacious dose in units of enzyme activity could not be established. The FEEDAP Panel concluded that the additive has the potential to be efficacious at a nominal dose of 500 mg additive/kg feed in chickens for fattening and laying hens and at a nominal dose of 250 mg additive/kg feed in turkeys for fattening. These conclusions can be extended to chickens reared for laying and turkeys reared for breeding at the corresponding dose. The conclusions on efficacy in poultry species can be extrapolated to minor poultry species and ornamental birds at the nominal dose of 250 mg/kg feed for fattening birds and of 500 mg/kg feed for laying birds. The FEEDAP Panel could not conclude on the efficacy in weaned piglets. (C) European Food Safety Authority, 2015
引用
收藏
页数:33
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Scientific Opinion on the maintenance of the list of QPS biological agents intentionally added to food and feed (2013 update)
    Andreoletti, Olivier
    Baggesen, Dorte Lau
    Bolton, Declan
    Butaye, Patrick
    Cook, Paul
    Davies, Robert
    Escamez, Pablo S. Fernandez
    Griffin, John
    Hald, Tine
    Havelaar, Arie
    Koutsoumanis, Kostas
    Lindqvist, Roland
    McLauchlin, James
    Nesbakken, Truls
    Prieto, Miguel
    Ricci, Antonia
    Ru, Giuseppe
    Sanaa, Moez
    Simmons, Marion
    Sofos, John
    Threlfall, John
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2013, 11 (11)
  • [2] Guidance on the assessment of the toxigenic potential of Bacillus species used in animal nutrition
    Aquilina, Gabriele
    Bampidis, Vasileios
    Bastos, Maria De Lourdes
    Costa, Lucio Guido
    Flachowsky, Gerhard
    Gralak, Mikolaj Antoni
    Hogstrand, Christer
    Leng, Lubomir
    Lopez-Puente, Secundino
    Martelli, Giovanna
    Mayo, Baltasar
    Ramos, Fernando
    Renshaw, Derek
    Rychen, Guido
    Saarela, Maria
    Sejrsen, Kristen
    Van Beelen, Patrick
    Wallace, Robert John
    Westendorf, Johannes
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2014, 12 (05)
  • [3] Guidance on the assessment of bacterial susceptibility to antimicrobials of human and veterinary importance
    Aquilina, Gabriele
    Bories, Georges
    Chesson, Andrew
    Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro
    de Knecht, Joop
    Dierick, Noel Albert
    Gralak, Mikolaj Antoni
    Gropp, Jurgen
    Halle, Ingrid
    Hogstrand, Christer
    Leng, Lubomir
    Puente, Secundino Lopez
    Haldorsen, Anne-Katrine Lundebye
    Mantovani, Alberto
    Martelli, Giovanna
    Mezes, Miklos
    Renshaw, Derek
    Saarela, Maria
    Sejrsen, Kristen
    Westendorf, Johannes
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2012, 10 (06)
  • [4] Introduction of a Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) approach for assessment of selected microorganisms referred to EFSA
    Barlow, Sue
    Chesson, Andrew
    Collins, John D.
    Dybing, Erik
    Flynn, Albert
    Fruijtier-Poelloth, Claudia
    Hardy, Anthony
    Knaap, Ada
    Kuiper, Harry
    Le Neindre, Pierre
    Schans, Jan
    Schlatter, Josef
    Silano, Vittorio
    Skerfving, Staffan
    Vannier, Philippe
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2007, 5 (12)
  • [5] EC (European Commission), 2002, OP SCI COMM AN NUTR
  • [6] EFSA, 2004, EFSA J, V118, P1
  • [7] EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2005, EFSA J, V271, P1
  • [8] EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2007, EFSA J, V475, P1
  • [9] JECFA (Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives), 2006, JOINT FAO EXP COMM F