NOISE AS A PROBLEM FOR THE HEARING-IMPAIRED

被引:2
作者
PLOMP, R
FESTEN, JM
BRONKHORST, AW
机构
[1] Department of Otolaryngology, Free University Hospital
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0160-4120(90)90007-S
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper gives some results of current research on the elevation of the Speech-Reception Threshold (SRT) in noise due to hearing impairment. The experiments were carried out with simple sentences as speech material. The noise had the same spectrum as the long-term average of the speech signal. The SRT was the level at which 50% of the sentences were repeated correctly by the listener. Roughly, in the case of steady-state noise, a 3 dB higher speech-to-noise ratio is required. In the case of a fluctuating interfering sound (e.g., a competing peaker), the critical speech-to-noise ratio is about 8.5 dB higher than for normal-hearing listeners. Subsequent data suggest that for the hearing-impaired listeners the benefit of binaural hearing is about 3 dB less than in normal hearing. Since a difference of 1 dB in SRT corresponds with 16-20% difference in the intelligibility score of sentences, the data can explain why many hearing-impaired people have difficulties in understanding speech at speech-to-noise ratios acceptable for normal-hearing listeners. © 1990.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 398
页数:6
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]  
Bronkhorst, Plomp, The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 83, pp. 1508-1516, (1988)
[2]  
Duquesnoy, Effect of a single interfering noise or speech source upon the binaural sentence intelligibility of aged persons, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 74, pp. 739-743, (1983)
[3]  
Festen, Plomp, The extra effect of masker fluctuations on the SRT for hearing-impaired listeners, Proc. 12th int. congress on acoustics, Toronto, 1986, 1, (1986)
[4]  
Plomp, A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired, J. Speech Hearing res., 29, pp. 146-154, (1986)
[5]  
Plomp, Mimpen, Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences, Audiology, 18, pp. 43-52, (1979)