Surgical Apgar Score - A Simple Prognostic Tool in Surgery

被引:5
作者
Santoshsingh, S. R. [1 ]
Sathyakrishna, B. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Marthas Hosp, Dept Surg, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
关键词
Estimated blood loss; Mean arterial pressure; Surgical Apgar score;
D O I
10.17354/ijss/2016/361
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Introduction: In today's era cost of health care is of growing importance and it is important to recognize patients at increased risk of post-operative morbidity and mortality and to find interventions to reduce the risk. Hence, there is a need of an objective prognostic tool to assess the post-operative outcome of patients, than the subjective gut feeling of surgeons. The surgical Apgar score (SAS) is a simple score that uses intraoperative information on hemodynamics and blood loss of patient to predict post-operative morbidity and mortality. Score on a scale of 0-10 calculated from three parameters collected during the operative procedure, lowest heart rate (HR), lowest mean arterial pressure (MAP), and estimated blood loss. Materials and Methods: It is an 18 months prospective study done in St. Martha's Hospital, Bengaluru. Emergency and elective major cases were included in this study. SAS calculated based on intraoperative parameters lowest MAP, lowest HR, and amount of blood loss. Results: A total of 100 patients studied, age ranged from 18 to 70 years. 61 elective and 39 emergency surgeries, the majority were gastrointestinal surgeries. SAS was significantly associated with post-operative morbidity and mortality within 30 days (P < 0.001). Of 100 patients, 30 had SAS 4 or less. Complications noted in 16 out of 30 patients. By comparison among 5 patients with SAS 9 or 10 none experienced complications. Conclusion: SAS is a simple prognostic tool for assessing post-operative outcome in general surgical patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 5
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2003, REPORT NATL CONFIDEN
  • [2] Comparison of Surgical Risk Score, POSSUM and p-POSSUM in higher-risk surgical patients
    Brooks, MJ
    Sutton, R
    Sarin, S
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 92 (10) : 1288 - 1292
  • [3] Capewell S, 1996, BRIT MED J, V312, P991
  • [4] A Review of Risk Scoring Systems Utilised in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Surgery
    Chandra, Aninda
    Mangam, Sudhakar
    Marzouk, Deya
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2009, 13 (08) : 1529 - 1538
  • [5] COPELAND GP, 1991, BRIT J SURG, V78, P356
  • [6] Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey
    Dindo, D
    Demartines, N
    Clavien, PA
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) : 205 - 213
  • [7] We still need to operate at night!
    Faiz O.
    Banerjee S.
    Tekkis P.
    Papagrigoriadis S.
    Rennie J.
    Leather A.
    [J]. World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 2 (1)
  • [8] An Apgar score for surgery
    Gawande, Atul A.
    Kwaan, Mary R.
    Regenbogen, Scott E.
    Lipsitz, Stuart A.
    Zinner, Michael J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2007, 204 (02) : 201 - 208
  • [9] Greenburg AG, 1998, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V1116, P788
  • [10] Hariharan Seetharaman, 2006, Curr Surg, V63, P226