Performance Evaluation of Two Reactive Routing Protocols for RWP Mobility Model with Different Speed

被引:0
作者
Singh, Neelam [1 ]
Shrivastava, Laxmi [1 ]
机构
[1] Madhav Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Elect, Gwalior, India
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUTURE GENERATION COMMUNICATION AND NETWORKING | 2016年 / 9卷 / 02期
关键词
MANET; AODV; DSR; QUALNET; 6.1; CBR; Random way point mobility model;
D O I
10.14257/ijfgcn.2016.9.2.10
中图分类号
TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0809 ;
摘要
Wireless adhoc network are self-creating, self-organizing and self-administrating. The nodes within the network are free to move thus network do not rely on the preexisting infrastructure. Due to ease in deployment of mobile adhoc network wireless network are widely used. In the wireless network topology continuously changes according to the data packets to be sent at the destination path. With this so many best results in the wireless communication in this era wireless network over took wired network. In this paper we have compared the performance of two reactive MANET routing protocols AODV and DSR by using random way point mobility model. Both share similar On-Demand behavior, but the protocol's internal mechanism leads to significant performance difference. We have analyzed the performance of protocols by network load, mobility model and type of traffic (CBR). A detailed simulation has been carried out in QUALNET 6.1. The metrics used for performance analysis are Throughput, Average end-to-end Delay and Average jitter.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 102
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Analysis of Performance of the Routing Protocols Ad Hoc using Random Waypoint Mobility Model Applied to an Urban Environment [J].
Enciso, Liliana ;
Quezada, Pablo ;
Fernandez, Jose ;
Figueroa, Byron ;
Espinoza, Veronica .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, VOL 1 (WEBIST), 2016, :208-213
[22]   MANET Routing Protocols vs. Mobility Models: Performance Analysis and Comparison [J].
Timcenko, Valentina ;
Stojanovic, Mirjana ;
Rakas, Slavica Bostjancic .
AIC '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED INFORMATICS AND COMMUNICATIONS: RECENT ADVANCES IN APPLIED INFORMAT AND COMMUNICATIONS, 2009, :271-+
[23]   Comparative Analysis of Reactive MANET Routing Protocols Under the Traffic of TCP VEGAS with Mobility Considerations [J].
Noorani, Razia Nisar .
ICET: 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, :457-461
[24]   A Succinct Comparative Analysis and Performance Evaluation of MANET Routing Protocols [J].
Natarajan, K. ;
Mahadevan, G. .
2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATICS, 2013,
[25]   Performance Comparison of MANET Routing Protocols with Mobility Model derived based on Realistic mobility pattern of Mobile Nodes [J].
Vijayavani, G. R. ;
Prema, G. .
2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMMUNICATION CONTROL AND COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES (ICACCCT), 2012, :32-36
[26]   Performance Evaluation and Comparison of Routing Protocols in MANETS [J].
Khanvilkar, Tejashree S. ;
Patil, K. P. .
2013 FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING, COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING TECHNOLOGIES (ICCCNT), 2013,
[27]   Performance Comparison of Reactive Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Network [J].
Abushiba, Walid ;
Johnson, Princy .
2015 FORTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-TECHNOLOGIES AND NETWORKS FOR DEVELOPMENT, 2015, :1-5
[28]   PERFORMANCE COMPARISION OF DIFFERENT ROUTING PROTOCOLS WITH FUZZY INFERENCE SYSTEM IN MANET [J].
Goswami, Subhrananda ;
Joardar, Subhankar ;
Das, Chandan Bikash .
ADVANCES IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2015, 9 (27) :149-156
[29]   PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ROUTING PROTOCOLS IN MOBILE AD-HOC NETWORKS [J].
Nigam, Pratiksha ;
Tiwari, Ajay .
ADVANCES AND APPLICATIONS IN MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 20 (07) :1305-1317
[30]   Performance evaluation of multiple routing protocols using multiple mobility models for mobile ad hoc networks [J].
Shah, Nadir ;
Qian, Depei ;
Iqbal, Khalid .
INMIC: 2008 INTERNATIONAL MULTITOPIC CONFERENCE, 2008, :243-+