Institutions and Vote Unity in Parliaments: Evidence from 33 National Chambers

被引:25
作者
Coman, Emanuel Emil [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Polit & Int Relat, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
[2] Corpus Christi Coll, Oxford, England
关键词
vote unity; vote of confidence; accountability; roll call votes;
D O I
10.1080/13572334.2015.1040246
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The paper looks at the relationship between institutions and vote unity in national parliaments with the help of a large data set of votes from 33 national parliaments. The tests run are the first to confirm empirically the relationship between vote of confidence procedure and vote unity. The paper also provides a theoretical explanation for why the existence of the confidence procedure influences vote unity despite being used only rarely. The vote of confidence influences votes through the development of control mechanisms as well as the selection of party members who are more ideologically united. This study also challenges the view that electoral rules which make candidates individually accountable to voters necessarily lead to more vote defections. The findings suggest that higher personal accountability decreases vote unity only if party leaders do not control candidate nomination. Parties that rely on government finance for campaigns are also more united.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 389
页数:30
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
Agh A., 1994, EMERGENCE E CENTRAL
[2]  
Aldrich John H., 1995, WHY PARTIES ORIGIN T
[3]   Policy gatekeepers in Latin American legislatures [J].
Aleman, Eduardo .
LATIN AMERICAN POLITICS AND SOCIETY, 2006, 48 (03) :125-155
[4]  
[Anonymous], ELECTIONS AM
[5]   A comparative theory of electoral incentives - Representing the unorganized under PR, plurality and mixed-member electoral systems [J].
Bawn, K ;
Thies, MF .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL POLITICS, 2003, 15 (01) :5-32
[6]   Democratizing a democratic procedure: Myth or reality? Candidate selection in Western European parties, 1960-1990 [J].
Bille, L .
PARTY POLITICS, 2001, 7 (03) :363-380
[7]  
Bowler S, 1999, PARLIAMENTS LEGISL S, P3
[8]   Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses [J].
Brambor, T ;
Clark, WR ;
Golder, M .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2006, 14 (01) :63-82
[9]   The responsive legislature: Public opinion and law making in a highly disciplined legislature [J].
Calvo, Ernesto .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 37 :263-280
[10]  
Carey J. M., 2009, LEGISLATIVE VOTING A