SINGLE VS DOUBLE STAPLING TECHNIQUE IN COLORECTAL SURGERY - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL

被引：27
作者：
MORITZ, E
ACHLEITNER, D
HOLBLING, N
MILLER, K
SPEIL, T
WEBER, F
机构：
[1] 2nd Surgical Department, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg
来源：
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM | 1991年 / 34卷 / 06期
关键词：
RECTOSIGMOID RESECTION; SURGICAL STAPLERS; DOUBLE STAPLING TECHNIQUE;
D O I：
10.1007/BF02049936
中图分类号：
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号：
摘要：
Seventy patients after rectosigmoid resection were randomized to a rectal anastomosis either in the single or double stapling technique. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. A trend in favor of the double stapling technique was noted: 2.8 percent clinical leaks vs. 8.6 percent in the single stapling technique.
引用
收藏
页码：495 / 497
页数：3
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF THE EEA STAPLER FOR COLORECTAL ANASTOMOSES
    BEART, RW
    KELLY, KA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1981, 141 (01) : 143 - 147
  • [2] DOUBLE STAPLING TECHNIQUE FOR LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION
    COHEN, Z
    MYERS, E
    LANGER, B
    TAYLOR, B
    RAILTON, RH
    JAMIESON, C
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1983, 26 (04) : 231 - 235
  • [3] GRIFFEN FD, 1984, SURG CLIN N AM, V64, P579
  • [4] HERFARTH C, 1989, LANGENBECKS ARCH C S, V2, P679
  • [5] JULIAN TB, 1984, SURG CLIN N AM, V64, P567
  • [6] KNIGHT CD, 1980, SURGERY, V88, P710
  • [7] LEBLANC KA, 1988, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V123, P110
  • [8] SCHAFMAYER A, 1989, LANGENBECKS ARCH C S, V2, P379
  • [9] WEDELL HJ, 1986, KLAMMERNAHTTECHNIK, P144
1