SINGLE VS DOUBLE STAPLING TECHNIQUE IN COLORECTAL SURGERY - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL

被引：27

作者：

MORITZ, E

ACHLEITNER, D

HOLBLING, N

MILLER, K

SPEIL, T

WEBER, F

机构：

[1] 2nd Surgical Department, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg

来源：

DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM | 1991年 / 34卷 / 06期

关键词：

RECTOSIGMOID RESECTION; SURGICAL STAPLERS; DOUBLE STAPLING TECHNIQUE;

D O I：

10.1007/BF02049936

中图分类号：

R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Seventy patients after rectosigmoid resection were randomized to a rectal anastomosis either in the single or double stapling technique. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. A trend in favor of the double stapling technique was noted: 2.8 percent clinical leaks vs. 8.6 percent in the single stapling technique.

引用

页码：495 / 497

页数：3

共 9 条

[1] RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF THE EEA STAPLER FOR COLORECTAL ANASTOMOSES [J].

BEART, RW ;

KELLY, KA .

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1981, 141 (01) :143-147

[2] DOUBLE STAPLING TECHNIQUE FOR LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION [J].

COHEN, Z ;

MYERS, E ;

LANGER, B ;

TAYLOR, B ;

RAILTON, RH ;

JAMIESON, C .

DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1983, 26 (04) :231-235

[3]

GRIFFEN FD, 1984, SURG CLIN N AM, V64, P579

[4]

HERFARTH C, 1989, LANGENBECKS ARCH C S, V2, P679

[5]

JULIAN TB, 1984, SURG CLIN N AM, V64, P567

[6]

KNIGHT CD, 1980, SURGERY, V88, P710

[7]

LEBLANC KA, 1988, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V123, P110

[8]

SCHAFMAYER A, 1989, LANGENBECKS ARCH C S, V2, P379

[9]

WEDELL HJ, 1986, KLAMMERNAHTTECHNIK, P144

← 1 →