Using Curriculum-Based Measures for Identifying Gifted Learners

被引:3
|
作者
McGowan, Mark R. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Runge, Timothy J. [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
Pedersen, Jason A. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Penn, Dept Educ, Stouffer Hall,Room 246,1175 Maple St, Indiana, PA 15705 USA
[2] Indiana Univ Penn, Sch Psychol, Stouffer Hall,Room 246,1175 Maple St, Indiana, PA 15705 USA
[3] Indiana Univ Penn, Child Study Ctr, Indiana, PA 15705 USA
[4] Penn Psychol Assoc, Execut Board, Harrisburg, PA USA
[5] Assoc Sch Psychologists Penn, Execut Board, Harrisburg, PA USA
[6] Penn State Leadership Team Posit Behav Intervent, Execut Board, Harrisburg, PA USA
[7] Derry Township Sch Dist, Harrisburg, PA USA
[8] Assoc Sch Psychologists Penn, Philadelphia, PA USA
来源
ROEPER REVIEW-A JOURNAL ON GIFTED EDUCATION | 2016年 / 38卷 / 02期
关键词
curriculum-based measurement; dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills; gifted assessment; gifted learning; gifted rate of learning; indicators of giftedness; progress monitoring; response to intervention;
D O I
10.1080/02783193.2016.1150376
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
This study examined the utility of curriculum-based measures of oral reading fluency (ORF) to distinguish between gifted and general education students. Differences in reading proficiency and growth rate were assessed using cross-sectional data from more than 900 students in second through fifth grade who regularly participated in their district's triannual universal screening. Significant differences in dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills ORF scores were observed between gifted and general education students at all grade levels. Seasonal differences in rate of growth were observed in both groups, with more growth demonstrated at the beginning of the school year. Gifted learners did not demonstrate differential rates of growth from their general education peers. Recommendations for using these findings for practice and future research are offered.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 106
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The technical adequacy of curriculum-based writing measures with English learners
    Heather Campbell
    Christine A. Espin
    Kristen McMaster
    Reading and Writing, 2013, 26 : 431 - 452
  • [2] The technical adequacy of curriculum-based writing measures with English learners
    Campbell, Heather
    Espin, Christine A.
    McMaster, Kristen
    READING AND WRITING, 2013, 26 (03) : 431 - 452
  • [3] Using Curriculum-Based Measures With Postsecondary Students With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
    Hosp, John L.
    Hensley, Kiersten
    Huddle, Sally M.
    Ford, Jeremy W.
    REMEDIAL AND SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2014, 35 (04) : 247 - 257
  • [4] A literature synthesis of curriculum-based measurement in writing for English learners
    Alex Smith, R.
    Allen, Abigail A.
    Alley, Jessica
    PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 2024, 61 (04) : 1440 - 1457
  • [5] English Learners: Challenges in Assessment and the Promise of Curriculum-Based Measurement
    Sandberg, Karen L.
    Reschly, Amy L.
    REMEDIAL AND SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2011, 32 (02) : 144 - 154
  • [6] Curriculum-based measures of writing across grade levels
    Weissenburger, JW
    Espin, CA
    JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 43 (02) : 153 - 169
  • [7] Comparing Computer Adaptive and Curriculum-Based Measures of Math in Progress Monitoring
    Shapiro, Edward S.
    Dennis, Minyi Shih
    Fu, Qiong
    SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 2015, 30 (04) : 470 - 487
  • [8] Modeling Early Writing Growth With Curriculum-Based Measures
    Parker, David C.
    McMaster, Kristen L.
    Silberglitt, Benjamin
    Medhanie, Amanuel
    SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 2011, 26 (04) : 290 - 304
  • [9] Curriculum-Based Measures of Writing for High School Students
    Diercks-Gransee, Barbara
    Weissenburger, Jacalyn Wright
    Johnson, Cindy L.
    Christensen, Paul
    REMEDIAL AND SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2009, 30 (06) : 360 - 371
  • [10] Exploration of New Complexity Metrics for Curriculum-Based Measures of Writing
    Wagner, Kyle
    Smith, Alex
    Allen, Abigail
    McMaster, Kristen
    Poch, Apryl
    Lembke, Erica
    ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION, 2019, 44 (04) : 256 - 266