Consumers' willingness to pay for ethical attributes

被引:25
作者
Mai, Li-Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Westminster Business Sch, Dept Mkt & Business Strategy, Dept Mkt, London, England
关键词
Attitudes; Consumer behaviour; Field research;
D O I
10.1108/MIP-08-2013-0139
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose-In recent years, there has been a big increase in the use of ethical attributes as marketing appeals. The purpose of this paper is to examine consumers' willingness to pay for three selected ethical attributes, namely "Organic", " Recyclable Packaging" and "Fairtrade" in monetary terms. Design/methodology/approach -A modified choice-based experimental design with manipulation of the key constructs was used to estimate the mean value of how much consumers are willing to pay for the selected attributes attached to a box of premium chocolates. The results are based on the responses of a total of 208 consumers. Findings-Of the three attributes, " Recyclable Packaging" has the strongest influence on the purchase decision, although this attribute generates the least additional value. The aggregated result shows that although consumers are willing to pay more for the product with ethical attributes than the one that is without, still around a half of them are not willing to pay more. In terms of demographics, the results show no significant differences between the two genders or different age groups in their willingness to pay for ethical attributes. As might be expected, willingness to pay was correlated with the level of consciousness of the ethical attributes. Originality/value-The findings of this study help management to think practically about the value consumers willing to pay for the selected attributes. The results show a significant synergy in a combination of ethical attributes in products.
引用
收藏
页码:706 / +
页数:17
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   The treatment of income variable in willingness to pay studies [J].
Aiew, W ;
Nayga, RM ;
Woodward, RT .
APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2004, 11 (09) :581-585
[3]   What will consumers pay for social product features? [J].
Auger, P ;
Burke, P ;
Devinney, TM ;
Louviere, JJ .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2003, 42 (03) :281-304
[4]  
Bagozzi R.P., 1994, PSYCHOL MARKET, V11, P313, DOI DOI 10.1002/MAR.4220110403
[5]  
Carrigan M, 2004, J CONSUM MARK, V21, P401, DOI 10.1108/07363760410558672
[6]  
Carrigan M, 2001, J CONSUM MARK, V18, P560, DOI 10.1108/07363760110410263
[7]  
Caswell J., 2001, AM J AGR ECON, V78, P1248
[8]   CURRENT INFORMATION LEVELS ON FOOD LABELS [J].
CASWELL, JA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1992, 74 (05) :1196-1201
[9]  
Centre for Retail Research, 2012, RET ETH GREEN RET 20
[10]  
Clarke J., 2010, INDEPENDENT