STIMULUS FREQUENCY OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS FROM GUINEA-PIG AND HUMAN-SUBJECTS

被引:14
|
作者
SOUTER, M
机构
[1] Institute of Laryngology and Otology, University College London Medical School, London, WC1X 8EE
关键词
STIMULUS FREQUENCY OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; GUINEA PIG; HUMAN;
D O I
10.1016/0378-5955(95)00124-9
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) have previously been recorded from human subjects by the suppression of a continuous stimulus tone generated OAE by a second tone (Kemp et al., 1990). This study presents comparative data from guinea pig and human subjects using a similar method. Differences between human and guinea pig responses to suppressor tones of higher frequency than the stimulus tone are reported. The most effective suppressors of the SFOAE in human subjects was found to be a tone of the same or slightly higher frequency than the continuous stimulus tone. In guinea pigs, this stimulus condition was found to be less effective than higher-frequency suppressors. Large phase changes were found in the SFOAE from guinea pigs when higher-frequency suppressors were employed. These were not seen in the human data. Changes in the SFOAE latency from guinea pig ears were also found as the suppressing tone frequency moved above that of the stimulus tone. These level and phase effects, when taken together with latency changes, may be indicative of the differing contributions of stimulus-place generated OAEs and those from more basal elements to the total emission recorded in the meatus in guinea pig. The results are discussed in view of the known species differences in the tuning characteristics at the frequency region studied.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The influence of probe level on the tuning of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions and behavioral test in human
    Yao Wang
    Qin Gong
    Tao Zhang
    BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 15
  • [32] Wideband Profiles of Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions in Humans
    Dewey, James B.
    Dhar, Sumitrajit
    MECHANICS OF HEARING: PROTEIN TO PERCEPTION, 2015, 1703
  • [33] Modeling the effect of suppression on the periodicity of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions
    Lineton, B
    Lutman, ME
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2003, 114 (02): : 859 - 870
  • [34] Localization of the Reflection Sources of Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions
    A. Moleti
    R. Sisto
    Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2016, 17 : 393 - 401
  • [35] Localization of the Reflection Sources of Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions
    Moleti, A.
    Sisto, R.
    JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2016, 17 (05): : 393 - 401
  • [36] A parametric model of the spectral periodicity of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions
    Lineton, B
    Lutman, ME
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2003, 114 (02): : 883 - 895
  • [37] A parametric model of the spectral periodicity of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions
    Lineton, B. (b.lineton@soton.ac.uk), 1600, Acoustical Society of America (114):
  • [38] Two-tone suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions
    Keefe, Douglas H.
    Ellison, John C.
    Fitzpatrick, Denis F.
    Gorga, Michael P.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2008, 123 (03): : 1479 - 1494
  • [39] A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECT OF COCHLEAR PERFUSION WITH OUABAIN ON SUMMATING POTENTIALS AND DISTORTION-PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS IN THE GUINEA-PIG
    KLIS, SFL
    REBILLARD, G
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 1995, 252 (07) : 405 - 408
  • [40] Estimating Cochlear Frequency Selectivity with Stimulus-frequency Otoacoustic Emissions in Chinchillas
    Charaziak, Karolina K.
    Siegel, Jonathan H.
    JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2014, 15 (06): : 883 - 896