STIMULUS FREQUENCY OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS FROM GUINEA-PIG AND HUMAN-SUBJECTS

被引:14
|
作者
SOUTER, M
机构
[1] Institute of Laryngology and Otology, University College London Medical School, London, WC1X 8EE
关键词
STIMULUS FREQUENCY OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; GUINEA PIG; HUMAN;
D O I
10.1016/0378-5955(95)00124-9
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) have previously been recorded from human subjects by the suppression of a continuous stimulus tone generated OAE by a second tone (Kemp et al., 1990). This study presents comparative data from guinea pig and human subjects using a similar method. Differences between human and guinea pig responses to suppressor tones of higher frequency than the stimulus tone are reported. The most effective suppressors of the SFOAE in human subjects was found to be a tone of the same or slightly higher frequency than the continuous stimulus tone. In guinea pigs, this stimulus condition was found to be less effective than higher-frequency suppressors. Large phase changes were found in the SFOAE from guinea pigs when higher-frequency suppressors were employed. These were not seen in the human data. Changes in the SFOAE latency from guinea pig ears were also found as the suppressing tone frequency moved above that of the stimulus tone. These level and phase effects, when taken together with latency changes, may be indicative of the differing contributions of stimulus-place generated OAEs and those from more basal elements to the total emission recorded in the meatus in guinea pig. The results are discussed in view of the known species differences in the tuning characteristics at the frequency region studied.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MODELING STIMULUS-FREQUENCY OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS IN THE GECKO
    Bergevin, Christopher
    Shera, Christopher A.
    CONCEPTS AND CHALLENGES IN THE BIOPHYSICS OF HEARING, 2009, : 85 - +
  • [22] A direct method of estimation of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions
    Ziarani, AK
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-7, 2004, 26 : 518 - 521
  • [23] Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions evoked by swept tones
    Chen, Shixiong
    Deng, Jun
    Bian, Lin
    Li, Guanglin
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2013, 306 : 104 - 114
  • [24] Suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise
    Souter, M
    HEARING RESEARCH, 1995, 91 (1-2) : 167 - 177
  • [25] Guinea-pig RANTES activates human, but not guinea-pig, eosinophils
    Campbell, EM
    Watson, ML
    Proudfoot, AEI
    Wells, TNC
    Yoshimura, T
    Westwick, J
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 119 : P50 - P50
  • [26] STUDIES OF THE BINDING OF HUMAN AND GUINEA-PIG CL TO HUMAN AND GUINEA-PIG LYMPHOCYTES
    RICHARDSON, AK
    SARGENT, AU
    IMMUNOLOGICAL COMMUNICATIONS, 1980, 9 (06): : 577 - 593
  • [27] Group delays of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the guinea pig
    Schneider, S
    Prijs, VF
    Schoonhoven, R
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1999, 105 (05): : 2722 - 2730
  • [28] Influence of stimulus parameters on amplitude-modulated stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions
    Johnson, Tiffany A.
    Beshaler, Laura
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2013, 134 (02): : 1121 - 1133
  • [29] The influence of probe level on the tuning of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions and behavioral test in human
    Wang, Yao
    Gong, Qin
    Zhang, Tao
    BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ONLINE, 2016, 15
  • [30] Near equivalence of human click-evoked and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions
    Kalluri, Radha
    Shera, Christopher A.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2007, 121 (04): : 2097 - 2110