Remedy vs. Diagnosis. How Political Liberalism Accounts for Political Disagreement

被引:0
|
作者
Ciszewski, Wojciech [1 ]
Dyrda, Adam [1 ]
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ, Dept Law & Adm, Chair Legal Theory, Ul Bracka 12, PL-31005 Krakow, Poland
来源
DIAMETROS | 2013年 / 37卷
关键词
J; Rawls; W; B; Gallie; G; Lakoff; disagreement; error theory; essentially contested concepts;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
The problem of political disagreement is one of the most important problems, which provides the starting point for the construction of any contemporary political theory. Moreover, each and every theory can be evaluated by taking into account the efficacy of coping with different types of political disagreements. This paper discusses four different types of political disagreement (the error theory, value pluralism, the essential contestability of concepts, Lakoff's metaphor theory) and aims at answering the question whether the theory of political liberalism (founded by J. Rawls) is a good (i.e. efficacious) remedy for political disagreement. The result is moderately positive, as far as it reveals the weak points of this theory.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 33
页数:21
相关论文
共 3 条