Eliciting ELT Students' Understanding of Plagiarism in Academic Writing

被引:6
作者
Rets, Irina [1 ]
Ilya, Ali [2 ]
机构
[1] Open Univ, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, Bucks, England
[2] Sakarya Univ, TR-54050 Sakarya, Turkey
来源
EURASIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS | 2018年 / 4卷 / 02期
关键词
Paraphrasing and unacknowledged copying; plagiarism; scientific writing; think-aloud protocols; undergraduate research experience;
D O I
10.32601/ejal.464115
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Given that the term 'plagiarism is open to multiple interpretations, resulting in confusion among students and teachers alike, research that investigates the current state of empirical evidence and sheds light on students' ability to define and detect this notion has important pedagogical implications. This study examines undergraduate English Language Teaching (ELT) students' understanding of plagiarism in academic writing through qualitative data collection methods. After the focus group filled in the open-ended questionnaire, they were exposed to two sets of texts each containing an original, a plagiarized and non-plagiarized copy. The copy in the first set featured mainly word-for-word plagiarism while the copy in the second set was plagiarized in terms of illicit paraphrasing. The students were asked to identify whether there is any plagiarism in each copy and assess the texts regarding their acceptability in the format of an interview and think-aloud protocols. The results of the open-ended questionnaire and interviews were compared revealing that although all the students were able to define plagiarism correctly, most of them failed to identify it in the written text. The study also uncovered discrepancies in how the students view the aforementioned types of plagiarism. (C) 2018 EJAL & the Authors. Published by Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics (EJAL).
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 211
页数:19
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [21] Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second-language writing
    Pecorari, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2003, 12 (04) : 317 - 345
  • [22] Plagiarism and paraphrasing criteria of college and university professors
    Roig, M
    [J]. ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2001, 11 (03) : 307 - 323
  • [23] Sivasubramaniam S. D, 2004, P 1 INT C PLAG JISC, P205
  • [24] Straw D., 2002, COMMUNITY COLL WEEK, V14, P4
  • [25] Sutherland-Smith W., 2005, J ENGL ACAD PURP, V4.1, P83, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JEAP.2004.07.007
  • [26] Walker J., 1998, HIGH EDUC RES DEV, V17, P89, DOI [10.1080/0729436980170105, DOI 10.1080/0729436980170105]
  • [27] Wilkinson J., 2009, INT J TEACH LEARN HI, V20, P98
  • [28] Faculty and student perceptions on college cheating: evidence from Turkey
    Yazici, Asli
    Yazici, Sedat
    Erdem, Meziyet Sema
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL STUDIES, 2011, 37 (02) : 221 - 231