ACTIVE-TRANSPORT OF UREA BY MAMMALIAN KIDNEY

被引：24
作者：
BEYER, KH
GELARDEN, RT
机构：
来源：
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | 1988年 / 85卷 / 11期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1073/pnas.85.11.4030
中图分类号：
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号：
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：4030 / 4031
页数：2
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   BENEMID RHO-(DI-NORMAL-PROPYLSULFAMYL)-BENZOIC ACID - ITS RENAL AFFINITY AND ITS ELIMINATION [J].
BEYER, KH ;
RUSSO, HF ;
TILLSON, EK ;
MILLER, AK ;
VERWEY, WF ;
GASS, SR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1951, 166 (03) :625-640
[2]   THE MECHANISM OF ACTION OF CHLOROTHIAZIDE [J].
BEYER, KH .
ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1958, 71 (04) :363-379
[3]   RECIRCULATION OF UREA ANALOGS FROM RENAL COLLECTING DUCTS OF HIGH-PROTEIN-FED AND LOW-PROTEIN-FED RATS [J].
DANIELSON, RA ;
SCHMIDTN.B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1972, 223 (01) :130-+
[4]   ACTIVE CELLULAR TRANSPORT OF UREA BY FROG RENAL TUBULES [J].
FORSTER, RP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1954, 179 (02) :372-377
[5]   CONTRASTING INHIBITORY EFFECTS OF PROBENECID ON THE RENAL TUBULAR EXCRETION OF P-AMINOHIPPURATE AND ON THE ACTIVE REABSORPTION OF UREA IN THE DOGFISH, SQUALUS-ACANTHIAS [J].
FORSTER, RP ;
BERGLUND, F .
JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY, 1957, 49 (02) :281-285
[6]   UPHILL TRANSPORT OF UREA IN DOG KIDNEY - EFFECTS OF CERTAIN INHIBITORS [J].
GOLDBERG, M ;
WOJTCZAK, AM ;
RAMIREZ, MA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1967, 46 (03) :388-&
[7]   NET TRANSTUBULAR MOVEMENT OF WATER + UREA IN SALINE DIURESIS [J].
LASSITER, WE ;
MYLLE, M ;
GOTTSCHALK, CW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1964, 206 (04) :669-&
[8]   The secretory function of the renal tubules [J].
Marshall, EK ;
Crane, MM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1924, 70 (03) :465-488
[9]   Urea excretion in the normal dog during forced diuresis [J].
Shannon, JA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1938, 122 (03) :782-787
[10]   The retention and physiological role of urea in the elasmobranchii [J].
Smith, HW .
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS OF THE CAMBRIDGE PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY, 1936, 11 (01) :49-82
12