FECAL STREPTOCOCCI AS FECAL POLLUTION INDICATORS - A REVIEW .2. SANITARY SIGNIFICANCE, SURVIVAL, AND USE

被引:59
作者
SINTON, LW
DONNISON, AM
HASTIE, CM
机构
[1] Christchurch Science Centre, Institute of Environmental Health and Forensic Sciences Ltd, Christchurch
[2] Environmental Management Section, Meat Industry Research Institute of New Zealand (Inc.), Hamilton
[3] Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Lincoln University, Canterbury
[4] Tauranga
关键词
FECAL STREPTOCOCCI; ENTEROCOCCI; SANITARY SIGNIFICANCE; SURVIVAL; REVIEW;
D O I
10.1080/00288330.1993.9516550
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Some New Zealand regional councils are examining the use of faecal streptococci (or the subset, enterococci) to assist in identifying pollution sources, or as better indicators of disease risk in bathing waters than faecal coliforms. However, in spite of worldwide investigation, faecal streptococci have largely failed to fulfil their potential as pollution source (human versus animal) indicators in receiving waters. Many qualifications accompany the use of faecal coliform: faecal streptococci (FC:FS) ratios, and the species identification approach (using biochemical and DNA-based methods) has produced inconclusive results. Nevertheless, the FC:FS shift method (in which the ratio changes under sample storage) may warrant further investigation. Although reported results vary widely, most studies indicate that faecal streptococci outlive faecal coliforms in receiving waters and are more resistant to sunlight-induced inactivation. USEPA epidemiological studies showed that enterococcus concentrations were better correlated than faecal coliform concentrations with disease risk associated with bathing in sewage-polluted waters. These results, which implied that the enterococci better represented viral hazard, led the USEPA to recommend the use of enterococci (or Escherichia coli in freshwaters) as bathing water quality indicators. These recommendations have largely been followed in provisional New Zealand Department of Health guidelines. However, adoption of the USEPA criteria should be approached cautiously, because of doubts about their epidemiological applicability in New Zealand, and a lack of information about streptococcal concentrations and species profiles in local effluents and receiving waters.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 137
页数:21
相关论文
共 148 条
  • [1] Allen L.A., Pasley S.M., Pierce M., Some Factors Affecting the Viability of Faecal Bacteria in Water. Journal of General Microbiology 7, 1, 2, pp. 36-43, (1952)
  • [2] Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, (1992)
  • [3] Bartley C.H., Types and sanitary significance of fecal streptococci isolated from feces, sewage and water, American Journal of Public Health, 50, pp. 1545-1552, (1960)
  • [4] Bayne S., Blankson M., Thirkell D., Enumeration and speciation of group d streptococci from above and below a sewer outfall, their susceptibilities to six antibiotics and a comparison with clinical isolates, Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 49, pp. 399-410, (1983)
  • [5] Bergner-Rabinowitz S., The survival of coliforms, streptococcus faecalis and salmonella tennessee in the soil and climate of israel, Applied Microbiology, 4, pp. 101-106, (1955)
  • [6] Bitton G., Farrah S.R., Ruskin R.H., Butner J., Chou Y.L., Survival of pathogenic and indicator organisms in ground water, Ground Water, 21, pp. 405-410, (1983)
  • [7] B0rsheim K.Y., Bratbak G., Heldal M., Enumeration and biomass estimation of planktonic bacteria and viruses by transmission electron microscopy, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 56, pp. 352-356, (1990)
  • [8] Bridge P.D., Sneath P., Numerical taxonomy of streptococcus. Journal of general microbiology, 129, pp. 565-597, (1983)
  • [9] Brown J.M., Campbell E.A., Rickards A.D., Wheeler D., Sewage pollution of bathing water, Lancet, 11, pp. 1208-1209, (1987)
  • [10] Burman N.P., Stevens J.K., Evans A.W., Streptococci as indicators in water supplies, Academic Press Symposium Series, 7, pp. 335-347, (1978)