Stented Versus Stentless Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Small Aortic Root A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:12
作者
Harky, Amer [1 ]
Wong, Chris H. M. [2 ]
Hof, Alexander [3 ]
Froghi, Saied [4 ]
Ahmad, Mohammad U. [5 ]
Howard, Callum [5 ]
Rimmer, Lara [5 ]
Bashir, Mohamad [6 ]
机构
[1] Countess Chester Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Chester, Cheshire, England
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Fac Med, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Heinrich Heine Univ, Med Fac, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Dusseldrof, Germany
[4] Imperial Coll NHS Trust, Dept Surg, London, England
[5] Univ Liverpool, Sch Med, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[6] Manchester Royal Infirm, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
Aortic valve; Aortic valve replacement; Stentless bioprostheses; Stented bioprostheses; Small aortic root;
D O I
10.1097/IMI.0000000000000569
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The aim of the study was to compare hemodynamic and perioperative outcomes of stented against stentless aortic valve replacement in patients with small aortic root (21 mm or less). Methods: A comprehensive search was undertaken among the four major databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Ovid) to identify all randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials comparing stentless to stented bioprosthetic valves in small aortic root patients. Odds ratios, weighted mean differences, or standardized mean differences and their 95% confidence intervals were analyzed. Results: A total of seven studies with a total of 965 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in preoperative baselines including mean age between both groups (P = 0.08), peak aortic valve gradient (P = 0.06), and effective orifice area (P = 0.28), whereas higher mean aortic valve gradient in the stented group (P = 0.007). No difference in cardiopulmonary bypass time (P = 0.74), aortic cross-clamp times (P = 0.88), intensive care unit stay (P = 0.13), and stroke rate (P = 0.56) were noted. However, stented group of patients showed higher rate of patient prosthesis mismatch (P = 0.0001) and longer total hospital stay (P = 0.002). Postoperatively, stentless group showed lower peak and mean aortic valve gradient (P = 0.003 and P = 0.008, respectively) with a better effective orifice area (P < 0.00001) at 6 months of follow-up. Mortality rates while in-hospital and at 1 year were similar in both groups (P = 0.94 and P = 0.86, respectively). Conclusions: Stentless aortic valves offer superior short-term hemodynamic outcomes in patients with small aortic root when compared with stented aortic valves. Although both groups have similar perioperative complications rates, stentless valves bring about a shorter hospital stay. A further large multicenter randomized controlled trial should address the longer-term benefit of stentless aortic valve over stented valve.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 416
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Early clinical and hemodynamic outcomes after stented and stentless aortic valve replacement: Results from a randomized controlled trial [J].
Ali, Ayyaz ;
Halstead, James C. ;
Cafferty, Fay ;
Sharples, Linda ;
Rose, Fiona ;
Lee, Evelyn ;
Rusk, Rosemary ;
Dunning, John ;
Argano, Vincenzo ;
Tsui, Steven .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2007, 83 (06) :2162-2168
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, J CARDIOL CARDIOVASC
[3]   Impact of implant technique following freestyle stentless aortic valve replacement [J].
Bach, DS ;
Cartier, PC ;
Kon, ND ;
Johnson, KG ;
Deeb, GM ;
Doty, DB .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2002, 74 (04) :1107-1113
[4]   Small aortic root in aortic valve stenosis: clinical characteristics and prognostic implications [J].
Bahlmann, Edda ;
Cramariuc, Dana ;
Minners, Jan ;
Lonnebakken, Mai Tone ;
Ray, Simon ;
Gohlke-Baerwolf, Christa ;
Nienaber, Christoph A. ;
Jander, Nikolaus ;
Seifert, Reinhard ;
Chambers, John B. ;
Kuck, Karl Heinz ;
Gerdts, Eva .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2017, 18 (04) :404-412
[5]   A systematic review and meta-analysis of mechanical vs biological composite aortic root replacement, early and 1-year results [J].
Bashir, Mohamad ;
Harky, Amer ;
Froghi, Saied ;
Adams, Benjamin ;
Garner, Megan ;
Gupta, Prity ;
Oo, Aung ;
Uppal, Rakesh .
GENERAL THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 67 (01) :70-76
[6]   Aortic Valve Replacement: Are We Spoiled for Choice? [J].
Bashir, Mohamad ;
Harky, Amer ;
Bleetman, David ;
Adams, Benjamin ;
Roberts, Neil ;
Balmforth, Damian ;
Yap, John ;
Lall, Kulvinder ;
Shipolini, Alex ;
Oo, Aung ;
Uppal, Rakesh .
SEMINARS IN THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 29 (03) :265-272
[7]  
Beckmann A, 2015, THORAC CARDIOV SURG, V63, P258, DOI 10.1055/s-0035-1551676
[8]   Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement [J].
Blackstone, EH ;
Cosgrove, DM ;
Jamieson, WRE ;
Birkmeyer, NJ ;
Lemmer, JH ;
Miller, DC ;
Butchart, EG ;
Rizzoli, G ;
Yacoub, M ;
Chai, AK .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 126 (03) :783-796
[9]   Stentless aortic valve reoperations: A surgical challenge [J].
Borger, Michael A. ;
Prasongsukarn, Kriengchai ;
Armstrong, Susan ;
Feindel, Christopher M. ;
David, Tirone E. .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2007, 84 (03) :737-744
[10]   Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108,687 patients in 10 years: Changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database [J].
Brown, James M. ;
O'Brien, Sean M. ;
Wu, Changfu ;
Sikora, Jo Ann H. ;
Griffith, Bartley P. ;
Gammie, James S. .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 137 (01) :82-90