Cochrane systematic reviews in orthodontics

被引:1
|
作者
Deliere, Marie [1 ]
Yan-Vergnes, Wei [2 ]
Hamel, Olivier [3 ]
Marchal-Sixou, Christine [4 ]
Vergnes, Jean-Noel [5 ]
机构
[1] UFR Odontol Paris VII, Chirurg Dentaire, F-75006 Paris, France
[2] UFR Odontol Paris VII, Chirurg Dentaire, Dept Sante Publ, F-31400 Toulouse, France
[3] MCU PH, UFR Odontol Toulouse, Dept Sante Publ, F-31400 Toulouse, France
[4] MCU PH, UFR Odontol Toulouse, Dept Orthoped Dentofaciale, F-31400 Toulouse, France
[5] AHU, UFR Odontol Toulouse, Dept Epidemiol, 3,Chemin Maraichers, F-31400 Toulouse, France
关键词
Orthodontics; Evidence-Based Dentistry; Review;
D O I
10.1016/j.ortho.2010.07.012
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction. - The Cochrane Collaboration is an international scientific not-for-profit organization the purpose of which is to produce and distribute systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials. The aim of this paper is to list the different existing Cochrane systematic reviews in the field of dentofacial orthopedics (DFO) and to analyse their main features. Material and methods. - The choice of Cochrane systematic reviews based on dentofacial orthopedics was made from the exhaustive list published by the Cochrane Oral Health Group. Results. - A total of 12 systematic Cochrane reviews related to dentofacial orthopedics were listed. All concluded on the need to conduct randomized clinical trials using more appropriate methodologies and comprising larger samples. None of these systematic reviews offered clear proof supporting any one form of treatment or treatment modality. Discussion. - Despite the lack of relevant conclusions in the still meagre number of Cochrane systematic reviews related to DFO, it is essential for orthodontists to regularly consult the reviews in the framework of their daily evidence-based orthodontic practice. This is true too for orthodontic researchers as clinical DFO research needs to be extended with the setting up of methodologically unquestionable randomized clinical trials. However, there exist alternatives to randomized clinical trials offering a lower level of proof but which are better suited to the field of dentofacial orthopedics. (C) 2010 CEO. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:278 / 292
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Overview of the acupuncture parts in the Cochrane Database of systematic reviews and the Cochrane Collaboration *
    Zhang Kuo
    Chen Bo
    Li Zhong-zheng
    Ding Sha-sha
    Lu Zhong-xi
    Yu Hai-long
    Hong Shou-hai
    Liu Dan
    Zhao Xue
    Guo Yi
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ACUPUNCTURE-MOXIBUSTION, 2016, 26 (04) : 50 - 60
  • [22] The quality of Cochrane systematic reviews of acupuncture: an overview
    Zhaochen Ji
    Junhua Zhang
    Francesca Menniti-Ippolito
    Marco Massari
    Alice Josephine Fauci
    Na Li
    Fengwen Yang
    Mingyan Zhang
    BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, 20
  • [23] Cochrane Systematic Reviews in a world with data sharing
    Boutron, Isabelle
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, 10 : 31 - 32
  • [24] Cochrane Collaboration: more than systematic reviews?
    Green, S
    McDonald, S
    INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2005, 35 (01) : 4 - 5
  • [25] Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy
    Moseley, Anne M.
    Elkins, Mark R.
    Herbert, Robert D.
    Maher, Christopher G.
    Sherrington, Catherine
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 62 (10) : 1021 - 1030
  • [26] The quality of Cochrane systematic reviews of acupuncture: an overview
    Ji, Zhaochen
    Zhang, Junhua
    Menniti-Ippolito, Francesca
    Massari, Marco
    Fauci, Alice Josephine
    Li, Na
    Yang, Fengwen
    Zhang, Mingyan
    BMC COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE AND THERAPIES, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [27] LESSONS LEARNED IN CONDUCTING COCHRANE SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
    Wells, Kristen
    Kumar, Ambuj
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2017, 51 : S2336 - S2337
  • [28] Implementing systematic reviews of prognosis studies in Cochrane
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    Hooft, Lotty
    Williams, Katrina
    Hayden, Jill A.
    Damen, Johanna A. A. G.
    Riley, Richard D.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, (10):
  • [29] Conclusiveness of the cochrane neonatal reviews: A systematic analysis
    Mandel, Dror
    Littner, Yoav
    Mimouni, Francis B.
    Lubetzky, Ronit
    ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2006, 95 (10) : 1209 - 1212
  • [30] Systematic Cochrane Reviews in Neonatology: A Critical Appraisal
    Willhelm, Christiane
    Girisch, Wolfgang
    Gottschling, Sven
    Graeber, Stefan
    Wahl, Holger
    Meyer, Sascha
    PEDIATRICS AND NEONATOLOGY, 2013, 54 (04): : 261 - 266