Cochrane systematic reviews in orthodontics

被引:1
|
作者
Deliere, Marie [1 ]
Yan-Vergnes, Wei [2 ]
Hamel, Olivier [3 ]
Marchal-Sixou, Christine [4 ]
Vergnes, Jean-Noel [5 ]
机构
[1] UFR Odontol Paris VII, Chirurg Dentaire, F-75006 Paris, France
[2] UFR Odontol Paris VII, Chirurg Dentaire, Dept Sante Publ, F-31400 Toulouse, France
[3] MCU PH, UFR Odontol Toulouse, Dept Sante Publ, F-31400 Toulouse, France
[4] MCU PH, UFR Odontol Toulouse, Dept Orthoped Dentofaciale, F-31400 Toulouse, France
[5] AHU, UFR Odontol Toulouse, Dept Epidemiol, 3,Chemin Maraichers, F-31400 Toulouse, France
关键词
Orthodontics; Evidence-Based Dentistry; Review;
D O I
10.1016/j.ortho.2010.07.012
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction. - The Cochrane Collaboration is an international scientific not-for-profit organization the purpose of which is to produce and distribute systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials. The aim of this paper is to list the different existing Cochrane systematic reviews in the field of dentofacial orthopedics (DFO) and to analyse their main features. Material and methods. - The choice of Cochrane systematic reviews based on dentofacial orthopedics was made from the exhaustive list published by the Cochrane Oral Health Group. Results. - A total of 12 systematic Cochrane reviews related to dentofacial orthopedics were listed. All concluded on the need to conduct randomized clinical trials using more appropriate methodologies and comprising larger samples. None of these systematic reviews offered clear proof supporting any one form of treatment or treatment modality. Discussion. - Despite the lack of relevant conclusions in the still meagre number of Cochrane systematic reviews related to DFO, it is essential for orthodontists to regularly consult the reviews in the framework of their daily evidence-based orthodontic practice. This is true too for orthodontic researchers as clinical DFO research needs to be extended with the setting up of methodologically unquestionable randomized clinical trials. However, there exist alternatives to randomized clinical trials offering a lower level of proof but which are better suited to the field of dentofacial orthopedics. (C) 2010 CEO. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:278 / 292
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cochrane systematic reviews in orthodontics: trends across updates
    Reeves, Samuel
    Patel, Kishan
    Mukeshkumar, Krupali
    Naini, Farhad B.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2024, 46 (05)
  • [2] A comparison of the quality of Cochrane systematic reviews and non Cochrane systematic reviews
    Farquhar, C.
    Popovich, I.
    Windsor, B.
    Jordan, V.
    Shea, B.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2012, 27
  • [3] Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
    Solari, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2009, 16 (01)
  • [4] Systematic reviews and the Cochrane collaboration
    Kale, R
    Silagy, C
    NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDIA, 1996, 9 (01): : 3 - 4
  • [5] The Cochrane Collaboration and systematic reviews
    Clarke, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 94 (04) : 391 - 392
  • [6] The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
    Geddes, J
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 1996, 40 (04) : 438 - 439
  • [7] Prioritization of Cochrane Systematic Reviews
    Presley, C.
    Rundle, C. W.
    Kolodziejczyk, T.
    Andrews, S.
    Shumaker, P.
    Anand, P.
    Lee, K.
    Dellavalle, R. P.
    Boyle, R. J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2019, 181 (06) : 1303 - 1304
  • [8] Introduction to Cochrane Systematic Reviews
    Feagan, Brian G.
    McDonald, John W.
    Chande, Nilesh
    MacDonald, John K.
    INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, 2011, 17 (01) : 334 - 335
  • [9] Process of developing systematic reviews, including Cochrane reviews
    Bala, Malgorzata M.
    Lesniak, Wiktoria
    Jaeschke, Roman
    POLSKIE ARCHIWUM MEDYCYNY WEWNETRZNEJ-POLISH ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 125 : 16 - 25
  • [10] NOT ALL COCHRANE REVIEWS ARE GOOD QUALITY SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
    Deshpande, S.
    Misso, K.
    Westwood, M.
    Stirk, L.
    de Kock, S.
    Kleijnen, J.
    Clayton, D.
    Kleijnen, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (07) : A371 - A371