Improving the assessment and monitoring of forest biodiversity

被引:0
作者
Spanos, K. A. [1 ]
Feest, A. [2 ,3 ]
Petrakis, P. V. [4 ]
机构
[1] NAGREF, Forest Res Inst, Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] Univ Bristol, Dept Civil Engn, Water & Environm Management Res Ctr, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Ecosulis, Bath, Avon, England
[4] NAGREF, Inst Mediterranean Forest Ecosyst & Forests Prod, Athens, Greece
关键词
Forests; Biological analysis and testing; Ecology;
D O I
10.1108/14777830910922442
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose - This paper aims to present a general analysis and overview of forest biodiversity, emphasising the three main components (structure, composition, function) related to biodiversity. Following this theoretical consideration of forest biodiversity the current proposal of the European Environment Agency for biodiversity indicators is presented as a table with the application to forests identified and the direct/indirect nature of the indicator also indicated. Design/methodology/approach - The biodiversity of forests is determined by a number of overall large-scale factors that intimately affect the individual components of biodiversity. A more specific and direct measurement of forest biodiversity is presented with data assessed by the Fungib programme to provide a set of biodiversity indices that can be used to: create biodiversity baselines; compare sites; and follow biodiversity changes through time, all with the possibility of determining significance of change statistically. An example of data derived from a macrofungal survey is presented as an example of how this methodology can be adapted to many groups of organisms. Finally, a further example of using biodiversity quality data to understand changes in biodiversity is presented comparing butterfly biodiversity quality with nitrogen deposition. Findings - This paper shows how an example of function (nitrogen deposition) has affected an element of composition (butterfly biodiversity). This has been made possible by the use of a rational sampling methodology (TRIM) used over a number of years. This metadata analysis of butterfly survey data shows clearly that changes in the butterfly biodiversity quality would have been missed if the normal approach of equating biodiversity with species richness had been adopted. In this example nitrogen-sensitive species loss was compensated by nitrophilic species gain. Originality/value - Such a methodology, therefore, has much to recommend it and it has been shown to be applicable to a wide range of organisms from bryophytes to beetles. For forest biodiversity monitoring the adoption of this kind of rationale will hopefully yield far greater information to the scientific community and policy makers for little extra effort.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 63
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improving biodiversity monitoring
    Lindenmayer, David B.
    Gibbons, Philip
    Bourke, Max
    Burgman, Mark
    Dickman, Chris R.
    Ferrier, Simon
    Fitzsimons, James
    Freudenberger, David
    Garnett, Stephen T.
    Groves, Craig
    Hobbs, Richard J.
    Kingsford, Richard T.
    Krebs, Charles
    Legge, Sarah
    Lowe, Andrew J.
    McLean, Rob
    Montambault, Jensen
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    Radford, Jim
    Robinson, Doug
    Smallbone, Lisa
    Thomas, David
    Varcoe, Tony
    Vardon, Michael
    Wardle, Glenda
    Woinarski, John
    Zerger, Andre
    AUSTRAL ECOLOGY, 2012, 37 (03) : 285 - 294
  • [2] A review of the assessment of biodiversity in forest ecosystems
    Spanos, K. A.
    Feest, A.
    MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2007, 18 (04) : 475 - 486
  • [3] Forest biodiversity and its assessment by remote sensing
    Innes, JL
    Koch, B
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 1998, 7 (06): : 397 - 419
  • [4] Assessing and monitoring forest biodiversity: A suggested framework and indicators
    Noss, RF
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 1999, 115 (2-3) : 135 - 146
  • [5] Contemporary tools for identification, assessment and monitoring biodiversity
    Roy, P. S.
    Roy, Arijit
    Karnataka, Harish
    TROPICAL ECOLOGY, 2012, 53 (03) : 261 - 272
  • [6] Forest degradation assessment of Ratargul Special Biodiversity Protection Area for conservation implications
    Humayun-Bin-Akram, Md
    Masum, Kazi Mohammad
    FORESTIST, 2020, 70 (02) : 77 - +
  • [7] Sound-mapping a coniferous forest-Perspectives for biodiversity monitoring and noise mitigation
    Turner, Anthony
    Fischer, Michael
    Tzanopoulos, Joseph
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (01):
  • [8] A test for assessment of saproxylic beetle biodiversity using subsets of "monitoring species"
    Sebek, Pavel
    Barnouin, Thomas
    Brin, Antoine
    Brustel, Herve
    Dufrene, Marc
    Gosselin, Frederic
    Meriguet, Bruno
    Micas, Lilian
    Noblecourt, Thierry
    Rose, Olivier
    Velle, Laurent
    Bouget, Christophe
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 20 : 304 - 315
  • [9] The biodiversity quality of forest macrofungi and forest management
    Feest, Alan
    MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2009, 20 (01) : 21 - 32
  • [10] Valuing changes in forest biodiversity
    Czajkowski, Mikolaj
    Buszko-Briggs, Malgorzata
    Hanley, Nick
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (12) : 2910 - 2917