Developing Elementary Teachers' Understandings of Hedges and Personal Pronouns in Inquiry-Based Science Classroom Discourse

被引:15
作者
Oliveira, Alandeom W. [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Albany, Dept Educ Theory & Practice, 1400 Washington Ave.,113B, Albany, NY 12222 USA
关键词
Classroom discourse analysis; Language of science; Professional development; Teacher education; Elementary practicing teachers; Hedges; Pronouns;
D O I
10.1007/s10972-009-9157-4
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study examined the effectiveness of introducing elementary teachers to the scholarly literature on personal pronouns and hedges in classroom discourse, a professional development strategy adopted during a summer institute to enhance teachers' social understanding (i.e., their understanding of the social functions of language in science discussions). Teachers became aware of how hedges can be employed to remain neutral toward students' oral contributions to classroom discussions, invite students to share their opinions and articulate their own ideas, and motivate students to inquire. Teachers recognized that the combined use of I and you can render their feedback authoritative, you can shift the focus from the investigation to students' competence, and we can lead to authority loss. It is argued that explicitness, reflectivity, and contextualization are essential features of professional development programs aimed at improving teachers' understandings of the social dimension of inquiry-based science classrooms and preparing teachers to engage in inquiry-based teacher-student interactions.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 126
页数:24
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Learning as conceptual change: Factors mediating the development of preservice elementary teaschers' views of nature of science [J].
Abd-El-Khalick, F ;
Akerson, VL .
SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2004, 88 (05) :785-810
[2]   Teaching nature of science through inquiry: Results of a 3-year professional development program [J].
Akerson, Valarie L. ;
Hanuscin, Deborah L. .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2007, 44 (05) :653-680
[3]  
Akerson VL, 2000, J RES SCI TEACH, V37, P295, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200004)37:4<295::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-2
[5]  
Amit M., 2005, EDUC STUD MATH, V58, P145, DOI [10.1007/s10649-005-3618-2, DOI 10.1007/S10649-005-3618-2]
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1987, ENGL SPECIF PURP, DOI DOI 10.1016/0889-4906(87)90072-X
[7]  
Bernard H.R., 2002, RES METHODS ANTHR QU
[8]  
Bogdan RC, 2003, QUALITATIVE RES ED I
[9]  
Brewer C., 2000, SCH SCI MATH, V100, P7, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1949-8594.2000.TB17315.X
[10]  
Brown R., 1960, STYLE LANGUAGE, P252, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511813085