The Optimal Route of Administration of the Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Antagonist Abciximab During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Intravenous Versus Intracoronary

被引:19
|
作者
Iversen, Allan [1 ]
Galatius, Soren [1 ]
Jensen, Jan S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Gentofte Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Abciximab; coronary heart disease; glycoprotein IIb/IIIa; intracoronary; intravenous; percutaneous coronary intervention;
D O I
10.2174/157340308786349480
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The use of the glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist Abciximab has over the years become an important part of the anticoagulant regimen in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Abciximab is a potent inhibitor of platelet aggregation and thrombus formation, but other mechanisms, such as suppression of the inflammatory pathways, have also been proposed to contribute to the benefits of Abciximab. The optimal route of administration, i. e. intravenous versus intracoronary, of the first dose has been questioned, but only tested in small, non-randomised and retrospective studies or studies with short follow-up. No definite conclusion can be made based on these studies In this review we present the current knowledge published about the intracoronary administration of Abciximab including the mechanisms behind the potential beneficial effects, and the safety. The emphasis will be on clinical trials rather than on studies on the pharmacological mechanisms, as the latter have been reviewed thoroughly elsewhere. Our conclusion from this present review is that randomized trials of intracoronary versus intravenous bolus of Abciximab are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 299
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Appropriate bolus administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: intracoronary or intravenous? A comprehensive and updated meta-analysis and systematic review
    Ali-Hassan-Sayegh, Sadegh
    Mirhosseini, Seyed Jalil
    Shahidzadeh, Arezoo
    Rahimizadeh, Elham
    Sarrafan-Chaharsoughi, Zahra
    Ghodratipour, Zahra
    Lotfaliani, Mohammad
    Rezaeisadrabadi, Mohammad
    Dehghan, Hamid Reza
    Bireta, Christian
    Weymann, Alexander
    Sabashnikov, Anton
    Popov, Aron-Frederik
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2016, 74 (02) : 104 - 118
  • [2] Intracoronary versus intravenous administration of abciximab during percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome: grading the evidence through a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhai, Chuan-Nan
    Zhang, Ying
    Liu, Yu-Jie
    Liu, Xian-Feng
    Zhang, Hao
    Ren, Zhi-Jing
    Cong, Hong-Liang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (07): : 14024 - 14035
  • [3] Coronary perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of abciximab platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade: An algorithm for percutaneous management
    Dippel, EJ
    Kereiakes, DJ
    Tramuta, DA
    Broderick, TM
    Shimshak, TM
    Roth, EM
    Hattemer, CR
    Runyon, JP
    Whang, DD
    Schneider, JF
    Abbottsmith, CW
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2001, 52 (03) : 279 - 286
  • [4] Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors in percutaneous coronary intervention and acute coronary syndrome
    Crouch, MA
    Nappi, JM
    Cheang, KI
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2003, 37 (06) : 860 - 875
  • [5] Intravenous versus intracoronary bolus of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor administration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention on long-term left ventricular systolic and diastolic function
    Pellicori, Pierpaolo
    Torromeo, Concetta
    Barilla, Francesco
    Mangieri, Enrico
    Evangelista, Antonietta
    Truscelli, Giovanni
    Costanzo, Pierluigi
    Hoye, Angela
    Wong, Kenneth
    CARDIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 20 (03) : 310 - 317
  • [6] Intralesional versus intracoronary administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Sun, Binjie
    Liu, Zhen
    Yin, Hongshan
    Wang, Tao
    Chen, Tao
    Yang, Sen
    Jiang, Zhian
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (40)
  • [7] Intracoronary versus intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with STEMI: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hahn, JongSung
    Jeon, Jinyoung
    Geum, Min Jung
    Lee, Hyun Woo
    Shin, Jaekyu
    Chung, Woo-Young
    Yu, Yun Mi
    Ah, Young-Mi
    THROMBOSIS JOURNAL, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [8] Intracoronary versus intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with STEMI: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    JongSung Hahn
    Jinyoung Jeon
    Min Jung Geum
    Hyun Woo Lee
    Jaekyu Shin
    Woo-Young Chung
    Yun Mi Yu
    Young-Mi Ah
    Thrombosis Journal, 21
  • [9] Platelet inhibition and GP IIb/IIIa receptor occupancy by intracoronary versus intravenous bolus administration of abciximab in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction
    Desch, Steffen
    Siegemund, Annelie
    Scholz, Ute
    Adam, Natalie
    Eitel, Ingo
    de Waha, Suzanne
    Fuernau, Georg
    Lurz, Philipp
    Wetzel, Sabrina
    Schuler, Gerhard
    Thiele, Holger
    CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 101 (02) : 117 - 124
  • [10] Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor AntagonistsA Comparative Review of Their Use in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Can M. Nguyen
    Robert A. Harrington
    American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs, 2003, 3 (6) : 423 - 436