Impact of Crew Scheduling on Project Performance

被引:4
作者
Hanna, Awad S. [1 ]
Shapira, Aviad [2 ]
El Asmar, Mounir [3 ]
Taylor, Craig S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 2314 Engn Hall,1415 Engn Dr, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Fac Civil & Environm Engn, IL-32000 Haifa, Israel
[3] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainable Engn & Built Environm, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
Construction; Crew scheduling; Productivity; Schedule compression; Safety;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000121
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Contractors have responded to the growing pressure from owners to shorten project duration by employing a variety of crew-scheduling techniques. Unfortunately, only a limited knowledge base exists for determining the impact of different crew schedules on project performance in terms of cost, duration, productivity, and safety. Standard crew schedules include those that require crews to work 40 h per week, including five 8-h days, four 10-h days, or a second shift. Overtime schedules are also common, which require crews to work additional hours beyond the standard 40 h per week. These overtime schedules include five 9-h days, six 8-h days, or five 10-h days. In addition to the standard and overtime schedules, several other crew-scheduling techniques have been used successfully by contractors. This paper presents the results of a study on the impact of crew-scheduling techniques on overall project performance. The paper identifies the proper application and conditions for successful use of various crew-scheduling techniques and provides a comprehensive comparison that outlines a variety of crew-scheduling options, along with their impact on labor efficiency, project duration, worker safety, and project cost. Contractors can use the results to aid them in the selection of a scheduling technique to best meet the specific requirements of a project. (c) 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 44
页数:10
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Business Roundtable, 1982, CONSTR LAB MOT
[2]  
Construction Industry Institute (CII), 1988, SD43 CII
[3]  
Fly R. D, 1980, SUPERV MANAGE, V25, P16
[4]   Shift work, safety and productivity [J].
Folkard, S ;
Tucker, P .
OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 2003, 53 (02) :95-101
[5]   ROLLING FOURS - NOVEL WORK SCHEDULE [J].
GOULD, CH .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1988, 114 (04) :577-593
[6]  
Hanna A. S., 2004, FACTORS AFFECTING LA
[7]  
Hanna A. S., 2003, RR18511 CONSTR IND I
[8]   Impact of extended overtime on construction labor productivity [J].
Hanna, AS ;
Taylor, CS ;
Sullivan, KT .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 131 (06) :734-739
[9]  
Hung R., 1992, IND MANAGEMENT, V34, P6
[10]   Optimizing the utilization of multiple labor shifts in construction projects [J].
Jun, Dho Heon ;
El-Rayes, Khaled .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2010, 19 (02) :109-119