THE PLACE OF RADICAL CYSTECTOMY IN TREATMENT OF BLADDER CANCER IN THE ELDERLY

被引:0
作者
Tekin, Ali [1 ]
Sengor, Feridun [1 ]
机构
[1] Haydarpasa Numune Hastanesi 1, Urol Klin, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2006年 / 32卷 / 01期
关键词
Bladder cancer; radical cystectomy; elderly; morbidity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: As the life expectancy increases, population is progressively becoming older. One of the natural results of this is the disproportionate increase in the incidence of bladder cancer seen in the elderly. Significant changes in physiology and comorbidity at older ages may make cancer treatment difficult. Standard treatment of nonmetastatic invasive bladder cancer is radical cystectomy. However, due to the belief that a major surgical intervention is not suitable in elderly patients they are managed by the alternative conservative methods and even only by palliative care. The results of the population-based prospective data collection studies verify the disparity of practice patterns between younger and older patients with bladder cancer and document that effective treatments are avoided in this age group. Yet, there is strong evidence showing that aggressive treatments may improve survival of these patients. Available literature data suggest that ineffective cancer treatment is the main reason for mortality rather than comorbidity. Many studies published recently demonstrate that radical cystectomy is a safe treatment in advanced aged patients. A general good health status and adequate cardiac and pulmonary functions are important for patient selection for cystectomy. However, more objective criteria are needed for appropriate risk categorization. Data of current epidemiological and clinical studies suggest that based on age alone radical cystectomy should not be avoided in patients with invasive bladder cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 13
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Radical cystectomy is safe in elderly patients at high risk
    Chang, SS
    Alberts, G
    Cookson, MS
    Smith, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (03) : 938 - 940
  • [2] Radical cystectomy in the elderly - Comparison of survival between younger and older patients
    Clark, PE
    Stein, JP
    Groshen, SG
    Cai, J
    Miranda, G
    Lieskovsky, G
    Skinner, DG
    [J]. CANCER, 2005, 103 (03) : 546 - 552
  • [3] Figueroa AJ, 1998, CANCER, V83, P141, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980701)83:1<141::AID-CNCR19>3.0.CO
  • [4] 2-X
  • [5] Aggressive treatment for bladder cancer is associated with improved overall survival among patients 80 years old or older
    Hollenbeck, BK
    Miller, DC
    Taub, D
    Dunn, RL
    Underwood, W
    Montie, JE
    Wei, JT
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2004, 64 (02) : 292 - 297
  • [6] Long-term followup of all patients with muscle invasive (stages T2, T3 and T4) bladder carcinoma in a geographical region
    Holmang, S
    Hedelin, H
    Anderstrom, C
    Johansson, SL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (02) : 389 - 392
  • [7] Long-term followup of a bladder carcinoma cohort: Questionable value of radical radiotherapy
    Holmang, S
    Hedelin, H
    Borghede, G
    Johansson, SL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (05) : 1642 - 1646
  • [8] Hoyert D L, 1999, Natl Vital Stat Rep, V47, P1
  • [9] Cancer statistics, 2002
    Jemal, A
    Thomas, A
    Murray, T
    Thun, M
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2002, 52 (01) : 23 - 47
  • [10] Lance R S, 2001, Semin Urol Oncol, V19, P51