DOUBLE-BLIND CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIAL OF RADIATION PLUS RAZOXANE (ICRF-159) VERSUS RADIATION PLUS PLACEBO IN TREATMENT OF HEAD AND NECK CANCER

被引:14
|
作者
BAKOWSKI, MT
MACDONALD, E
MOULD, RF
CAWTE, P
SLOGGEM, J
BARRETT, A
DALLEY, V
NEWTON, KA
WESTBURY, G
JAMES, SE
HELLMANN, K
机构
[1] WESTMINSTER HOSP,DEPT PHYS,LONDON SW1P 2AP,ENGLAND
[2] WESTMINSTER HOSP,DEPT SURG,LONDON SW1P 2AP,ENGLAND
[3] WESTMINSTER HOSP PHARM,LONDON SW1P 2AP,ENGLAND
[4] IMPERIAL CANC RES FUND,DEPT CANC CHEMOTHERAPY,LONDON WC2A 3PX,ENGLAND
[5] ROYAL MARSDEN HOSP,DEPT RADIOTHERAPY,LONDON SW3,ENGLAND
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 1978年 / 4卷 / 1-2期
关键词
Double blind; Head and neck; Placebo; Radiation; Razoxane;
D O I
10.1016/0360-3016(78)90125-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Ninety patients with salivary gland or squamous cell tumours of the head and neck region presenting to two centres were included in a double blind controlled clinical trial of radiation plus razoxane versus radiation plus placebo. The patients were paired according to treatment centre, sex, tumour site and tumour stage, one member of a pair receiving razoxane and one placebo during radiotherapy. The dose of razoxane administered was 125 mg in the morning and 62.5 mg in the evening of each day of radiation. The treatments were assessed by comparing the tumour response of pairs of patients and the preferences for treatment type analyzed sequentially on the plan described by Bross. Of the 18 pairs eligible for analysis at the completion of the trial, one showed a preference for the treatment radiation plus razoxane, nine for the treatment radiation plus placebo, four showed no preference for either treatment and four had not been assessed. The conclusion drawn from the sequential analysis of the results is that razoxane, in the dose and schedule employed, has a deleterious effect on the response of head and neck tumours to radiation. Excluding a positive placebo action, the possibility of a radioprotective effect of razoxane is discussed and the importance of reconsidering the dose and timing of administration of the drug in future clinical studies is emphasized. © 1978.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 119
页数:5
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [41] Topical steroid versus placebo for the prevention of radiation dermatitis in head and neck cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy: the study protocol of J-SUPPORT 1602 (TOPICS study), a randomized double-blinded phase 3 trial
    Zenda, Sadamoto
    Yamaguchi, Takuhiro
    Yokota, Tomoya
    Miyaji, Tempei
    Mashiko, Tomoe
    Tanaka, Mari
    Yonemura, Masahito
    Takeno, Misaki
    Okano, Tomoka
    Kawasaki, Toshikatsu
    Nakamori, Yuko
    Ishii, Shinobu
    Shimada, Sanae
    Kanamaru, Miyuki
    Uchitomi, Yosuke
    BMC CANCER, 2018, 18
  • [42] Intra-articular Autologous Conditioned Plasma Injections Provide Safe and Efficacious Treatment for Knee Osteoarthritis: An FDA-Sanctioned, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial
    Smith, Patrick A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (04) : 884 - 891
  • [43] Mepitel Film is superior to Biafine cream in managing acute radiation-induced skin reactions in head and neck cancer patients: a randomised intra-patient controlled clinical trial
    Yan, Jing
    Yuan, Ling
    Wang, Juan
    Li, Shuangshuang
    Yao, Mengdi
    Wang, Kongcheng
    Herst, Patries M.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIATION SCIENCES, 2020, 67 (03) : 208 - 216
  • [44] Hyaluronic Acid Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma: A Prospective, Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Clinical Outcomes and Effects on Intra-articular Biology for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis
    Cole, Brian J.
    Karas, Vasili
    Hussey, Kristen
    Pilz, Kyle
    Fortier, Lisa A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 45 (02) : 339 - 346