Comparison between fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and core needle biopsy (CNB) in the diagnosis of breast lesions

被引:27
作者
Moschetta, M. [1 ]
Telegrafo, M. [1 ]
Carluccio, D. A. [1 ]
Jablonska, J. P. [1 ]
Rella, L. [1 ]
Serio, G. [1 ]
Carrozzo, M. [1 ]
Ianora, A. A. Stabile [1 ]
Angelelli, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bari, Sch Med, Bari, Italy
来源
GIORNALE DI CHIRURGIA | 2014年 / 35卷 / 7-8期
关键词
Breast; Fine-needle aspiration cytology; Core needle biopsy; FNAC; CNB;
D O I
10.11138/gchir/2014.35.7.171
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim. To compare the diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and core needle biopsy (CNB) in patients with USdetected breast lesions. Patients and methods. Between September 2011 and May 2013, 3469 consecutive breast US examinations were performed. 400 breast nodules were detected in 398 patients. 210 FNACs and 190 CNBs were performed. 183 out of 400 (46%) lesions were surgically removed within 30 days form diagnosis; in the remaining cases, a six month follow up US examination was performed. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive (PPV) and negative predictive (NPV) values were calculated for FNAC and CNB. Results. 174 out of 400 (43%) malignant lesions were found while the remaining 226 resulted to be benign lesions. 166 out of 210 (79%) FNACs and 154 out of 190 (81%) CNBs provided diagnostic specimens. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, PPV and NPV of 97%, 94%, 95%, 91% and 98% were found for FNAC, and values of 92%, 82%, 89%, 92% and 82% were obtained for CNB. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, PPV and NPV of 97%, 96%, 96%, 97% and 96% were found for FNAC, and values of 97%, 96%, 96%, 97% and 96% were obtained for CNB. Conclusion. FNAC and CNB provide similar values of diagnostic accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 176
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   A comparision of aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy according to tumor size of suspicious breast lesions [J].
Barra, Alexandre De Almeida ;
Gobbi, Helenice ;
Rezende, Cesar Alencar de L. ;
Gouvea, Agostinho Pinto ;
Murta de Lucena, Clecio Enio ;
Pena Reis, Joao Henrique ;
Costa , Soraya Zhouri .
DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2008, 36 (01) :26-31
[2]   Fine-needle aspiration cytology vs. core biopsy in the diagnosis of breast lesions [J].
Berner, A ;
Davidson, B ;
Sigstad, E ;
Risberg, B .
DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2003, 29 (06) :344-348
[3]  
Boerner S, 1999, CANCER CYTOPATHOL, V87, P19, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990225)87:1<19::AID-CNCR4>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-K
[5]   Alternative breast-imaging approaches [J].
Brenner, R. James ;
Parisky, Yuri .
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2007, 45 (05) :907-+
[6]   Revaluation of breast cytology with pathologist on-site of lesions with suspicious sonographic features [J].
Capalbo, Emanuela ;
Sajadidehkordi, Farideh ;
Colombi, Claudio ;
Ticha, Vladimira ;
Moretti, Angela ;
Peli, Michela ;
Cosentino, Maria ;
Lovisatti, Maria ;
Berti, Elisabetta ;
Cariati, Maurizio .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 82 (09) :1410-1415
[7]  
Chan SWW, 2008, WORLD J SURG, V32, P2593, DOI 10.1007/s00268-007-9273-2
[8]   Characterization of solid breast masses -: Use of the sonographic breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon [J].
Costantini, Melania ;
Belli, Paolo ;
Lombardi, Roberta ;
Franceschini, Gianluca ;
Mule, Antonino ;
Bonomo, Lorenzo .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2006, 25 (05) :649-659
[9]   US-guided core-needle biopsy of the breast: How many specimens are necessary [J].
Fishman, JE ;
Milikowski, C ;
Ramsinghani, R ;
Velasquez, MV ;
Aviram, G .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 226 (03) :779-782
[10]   Diagnostic value of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy, core-needle biopsy, and evaluation of combined use in the diagnosis of breast lesions [J].
Hatada, T ;
Ishii, H ;
Ichii, S ;
Okada, K ;
Fujiwara, Y ;
Yamamura, T .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2000, 190 (03) :299-303