A multi-theoretical perspective on power in managing interorganizational relationships

被引:12
作者
Belaya, Vera [1 ]
Hanf, Jon [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent & Eastern Europe IAMO, Dept Agr Markets Mkt & World Agr Trade, Leibniz Inst Agr Dev, Halle, Saale, Germany
关键词
Management power; Sociology; Psychology; Control; Influence;
D O I
10.1108/03068290910992606
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine power from a multi-theoretical perspective by comparing and analyzing different views and definitions of power in order to use the findings for further studying this construct as a key element for managerial purposes in the interorganizational context. Design/methodology/approach - An overview of the literature is conducted examining the power from sociological, psychological and managerial perspectives specifying views on power, its sources and consequences of its use offered by selected theories. Findings - This paper presents the opinion that the definitions of power by different theories resemble each other and the main differentiations in conceptualizations of power stem mostly from the differences in capturing sources and consequences of power. Power generally refers to the ability, capacity or potential to get others do something, to command, to influence, to determine or to control the behaviors, intentions, decisions or actions of others in the pursuit of one's own goals or interests despite resistance, as well as to induce changes. Originality/value - The fact that power can be used as an effective tool to coordinate and manage others appears to be largely ignored in the literature. In order to understand how to use it for these purposes, it is necessary to define power, which is an elusive concept that has a variety of meanings and definitions, and there seems to be much disagreement to the precise meaning of power.
引用
收藏
页码:1040 / +
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Alchian A. A., 1965, 2 POLIT, P816
[2]   STRUCTURAL SOURCES OF INTRAORGANIZATIONAL POWER - A THEORETICAL SYNTHESIS [J].
ASTLEY, WG ;
SACHDEVA, PS .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1984, 9 (01) :104-113
[3]  
Bacharach P., 1980, POWER POLITICS ORG
[4]  
Barnes B., 1988, THE NATURE OF POWER
[5]   Norms and power in marketing relationships: Alternative theories and empirical evidence [J].
Berthon, P ;
Pitt, LF ;
Ewing, MT ;
Bakkeland, G .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2003, 56 (09) :699-709
[6]   AN ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL POWER [J].
Bierstedt, Robert .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1950, 15 (06) :730-738
[7]  
Blau P.M., 1964, EXCHANGE POWER SOC, P117
[8]  
BONACICH P, 1987, AM J SOCIOL, V92, P1170, DOI 10.1086/228631
[9]   THE DISTRIBUTION OF POWER IN EXCHANGE NETWORKS - THEORY AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS [J].
COOK, KS ;
EMERSON, RM ;
GILLMORE, MR ;
YAMAGISHI, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1983, 89 (02) :275-305
[10]   THE CONCEPT OF POWER [J].
DAHL, RA .
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1957, 2 (03) :201-215