Pregnancy rate after ovulation triggering with gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist versus human chorionic gonadotrophin in women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation/intrauterine insemination

被引:4
作者
Soliman, Badeea [1 ]
Siam, Soha [1 ]
机构
[1] Zagazig Univ, Fac Med, Zagazig, Egypt
关键词
GnRH agonist; Ovulation triggering; IUI; Pregnancy rate;
D O I
10.1016/j.mefs.2013.08.002
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: GnRHa is as effective as hCG for ovulation triggering, apart from LH surge, FSH surge is also induced. Objective: To compare triggering of ovulation by inducing endogenous LH surge (GnRHa) or using hCG in hMG stimulated cycles for intrauterine insemination (IUI). Setting: Prospective randomized study. Materials and methods: Out of the three hundred and eighty patients scheduled for IUI, after exclusion of 28 women, 352 were assigned to two groups: hMG/GnRHa (study group, n = 176) were assigned for receiving HP hMG followed by triggering by GnRHa and hMG/hCG (control group, n = 176) were assigned for HP hMG followed by hCG for ovulation triggering. Intrauterine insemination was done using freshly prepared semen 36 h after triggering of ovulation. Luteal phase support was done by 1500 IU hCG, 12 h after the triggering of ovulation. Results: LH levels significantly (p < 0.001) increased in the hMG/GnRHa group than in the hMG/hCG group. No significant differences were seen between the basal LH, progesterone levels before and 8 days after triggering in both groups. The duration of the luteal phase was similar in both groups. Pregnancy rates per cycle were 17.61% for GnRHa and 13.06% for hCG respectively (p = 0.23). Conclusions: There is no difference between GnRHa and hCG as regards pregnancy rate in women undergoing hMG stimulation for IUI cycles. (C) 2013 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Middle East Fertility Society.
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 267
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Comparison of different doses of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist Cetrorelix during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation
    Albano, C
    Smitz, J
    Camus, M
    RiethmullerWinzen, H
    VanSteirteghem, A
    Devroey, P
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1997, 67 (05) : 917 - 922
  • [2] Serum inhibin A, VEGF and TNFα levels after triggering oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist compared with HCG in women with polycystic ovaries undergoing IVF treatment:: a prospective randomized trial
    Babayof, R
    Margalioth, EJ
    Huleihel, M
    Amash, A
    Zylber-Haran, E
    Gal, M
    Brooks, B
    Mimoni, T
    Eldar-Geva, T
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2006, 21 (05) : 1260 - 1265
  • [3] Borm G, 2000, HUM REPROD, V15, P1490
  • [4] Cantineau AE, 2007, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V2, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.PUB2
  • [5] GONADOTROPIN-ESTRADIOL RESPONSES TO A SUPERACTIVE LUTEINIZING-HORMONE-RELEASING HORMONE AGONIST IN WOMEN
    CASPER, RF
    SHEEHAN, KL
    YEN, SSC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1980, 50 (01) : 179 - 181
  • [6] Casper RF, 1996, HUM REPROD, V11, P1144
  • [7] Luteal phase defects following agonist-triggered ovulation: a patient-dependent response
    Emperaire, JC
    Parneix, I
    Ruffie, A
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2004, 9 (01) : 22 - 27
  • [8] Endocrine profiles after triggering of final oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist after cotreatment with the GnRH antagonist ganirelix during ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization
    Fauser, BC
    de Jong, D
    Olivennes, F
    Wramsby, H
    Tay, C
    Itskovitz-Eldor, J
    van Hooren, HG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2002, 87 (02) : 709 - 715
  • [9] GnRH agonist for triggering final oocyte maturation in the GnRH antagonist ovarian hyperstimulation protocol: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Griesinger, G
    Diedrich, K
    Devroey, P
    Kolibianakis, EM
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2006, 12 (02) : 159 - 168
  • [10] HORMONAL DYNAMICS AT MIDCYCLE - A REEVALUATION
    HOFF, JD
    QUIGLEY, ME
    YEN, SSC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1983, 57 (04) : 792 - 796