Institutional dialogues: structure and legitimacy

被引：8

作者：

Cleve, Clemerson Merlin ^{[1
,2
]}

Lorenzetto, Bruno Meneses ^{[2
,3
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Fed Parana, Direito Constituc, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil

[2] UniBrasil, Ctr Univ Autonomo Brasil, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil

[3] Pontificia Univ Catolica Parana, Escola Direito, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil

来源：

REVISTA DE INVESTIGACOES CONSTITUCIONAIS-JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH | 2015年 / 2卷 / 03期

关键词：

Institutional Dialogues; Constitutional Jurisdiction; Legitimacy;

D O I：

10.5380/rinc.v2i3.44534

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

The article talks about the thesis of the institutional dialogues as an alternative to the judicial review legitimacy. It presents a critical view on the dichotomy between law and politics and on the proposal for strict separation of powers. Exposes the genesis of the theory of institutional dialogues in Canada and traces the difference between cases where dialogue actually occurs and when it becomes a normative demand. It deals with questions that were presented to the theories of dialogue and presents the one that would be its most promising theoretical version. Reports the mechanisms for achieving the institutional dialogue in Brazil and, at last, returns to the dichotomy between law and politics to suggest the maintenance of the institutions in which disagreements can continue to happen.

引用

页码：183 / 206

页数：24

共 45 条

[1]

Ackerman B., 1993, WE PEOPLE FDN

[2]

ACKERMAN Bruce, 2014, REV DIREITO ADMINIST, V265

[3]

ARGUELHES Diego Werneck, 2014, TRATADO DIREITO CONS, V2

[4]

BARROSO Luis Roberto, 2015, CONSULTOR JURIDICO

[5]

BARROSO Luis Roberto, 2020, CURSO DIREITO CONSTI, V9

[6]

Barroso Luis Roberto, 2012, NOVO DIREITO CONSTIT, P28

[7]

BARROSO Luis Roberto, 2014, CONSULTOR JURIDICO

[8]

Basile Marcello Otavio Neri de Campos, 2000, DISSERTACAO MESTRADO

[9]

BRANDAO Rodrigo, 2012, SUPREMACIA JUDICIAL

[10]

CAMERON Jamie, 2001, ALBERTA LAW REV, V38

← 1 2 3 4 5 →