Benefits of polymeric membranes in Oil and Gas produced water treatment

被引:9
作者
Sutton-Sharp, E. [1 ]
Ravereau, J. [1 ]
Guennec, M. [1 ]
Brehant, A. [1 ]
Bonnard, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] CIRSEE, 38 Rue President Wilson, F-78230 Le Pecq, France
关键词
filtration; membrane; oil; produced water; reinjection; reuse;
D O I
10.2166/wpt.2018.019
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Falling oil prices and increased environmental concern lead oil and gas companies to reinject produced water (PW) to reduce both their water management costs and environmental footprint. Membrane processes are an attractive opportunity because they generate a higher quality effluent than conventional PW treatment technologies at a competitive cost. The objective of the study was to compare the performances of ten membranes to treat PW and identify which of the structural and operational characteristics of the membranes are the success factors to ensure cost-effective, long-term and reliable operation. In oil and gas applications, ceramic filtration media is often preferred owing to its high structural robustness. Nevertheless, polymeric membranes offer the benefits of being less expensive and result in a lower footprint and weight. Tests using real oilfield PW were run to assess and compare ten membranes according to their oil rejection rate, permeability, resistance to fouling, life expectancy and resistance to ageing. All membranes tested achieved more than 99% removal of insoluble oil versus 80-85% for conventional technologies. The permeability over time and resistance to fouling were used to identify the most reliable and cost-effective membranes. The robustness of polymeric membranes was confirmed based on good resistance to ageing.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 311
页数:9
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   Treatment of oil sands process-affected water with ceramic ultrafiltration membrane: Effects of operating conditions on membrane performance [J].
Alpatova, Alla ;
Kim, Eun-Sik ;
Dong, Shimiao ;
Sun, Nian ;
Chelme-Ayala, Pamela ;
El-Din, Mohamed Gamal .
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 122 :170-182
[2]  
Amyx J.W., 1960, PETROLEUM RESERVOIR
[3]  
Drewes J., 2009, 0712212 RPSEA
[4]   Application of microfiltration for the treatment of Marcellus Shale flowback water: Influence of floc breakage on membrane fouling [J].
He, Can ;
Vidic, Radisav D. .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2016, 510 :348-354
[5]   Membrane technology enhancement in oil-water separation. A review [J].
Padaki, M. ;
Murali, R. Surya ;
Abdullah, M. S. ;
Misdan, N. ;
Moslehyani, A. ;
Kassim, M. A. ;
Hilal, N. ;
Ismail, A. F. .
DESALINATION, 2015, 357 :197-207
[6]  
Van Kuppevelt M. A., 2015, THESIS
[7]  
Veil J, 2009, PRODUCED WATER VOLUM
[8]   Fouling of microfiltration membranes by flowback and produced waters from the Marcellus shale gas play [J].
Xiong, Boya ;
Zydney, Andrew L. ;
Kumar, Manish .
WATER RESEARCH, 2016, 99 :162-170