Influence of Statistical Fluctuation on Reproducibility and Accuracy of SUVmax and SUVpeak: A Phantom Study

被引:76
作者
Akamatsu, Go [1 ,2 ]
Ikari, Yasuhiko [1 ]
Nishida, Hiroyuki [1 ]
Nishio, Tomoyuki [1 ]
Ohnishi, Akihito [1 ]
Maebatake, Akira [2 ]
Sasaki, Masayuki [2 ]
Senda, Michio [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Biomed Res & Innovat, Div Mol Imaging, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
[2] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Hlth Sci, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan
关键词
SUVmax; SUVpeak; FDG PET; statistical fluctuation; reproducibility;
D O I
10.2967/jnmt.115.161745
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Standardized uptake values (SUVs) have been widely used in the diagnosis of malignant tumors and in clinical trials of tumor therapies as semiquantitative metrics of tumor F-18-FDG uptake. However, SUVs for small lesions are liable to errors due to partial-volume effect and statistical noise. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility and accuracy of maximum and peak SUV (SUVmax and SUVpeak, respectively) of small lesions in phantom experiments. Methods: We used a body phantom with 6 spheres in a quarter warm background. The PET data were acquired for 1,800 s in list-mode, from which data were extracted to generate 15 PET images for each of the 60-, 90-, 120-, 150-, and 180-s scanning times. The SUVmax and SUVpeak of the hot spheres in the 1,800-s scan were used as a reference (SUVref,max and SUVrsf peak). Coefficients of variation for both SUVmax and SUVpeak in hot spheres (CVmax and CVpeak) were calculated to evaluate the variability of the SUVs. On the other hand, percentage differences between SUVmax and SUVref,max and between SUVpeak and SUVref,peak were calculated for evaluation of the accuracy of SUV. We additionally examined the coefficients of variation of background activity and the percentage background variability as parameters for the physical assessment of image quality. Results: Visibility of a 10-mm-diameter hot sphere was considerably different among scan frames. The CVmax and CVpeak increased as the sphere size became smaller and as the acquisition time became shorter. SUVmax was generally overestimated as the scan time shortened and the sphere size increased. The SUVmax and SUVpeak of a 37-mm-diameter sphere for 60-s scans had average positive biases of 28.3% and 4.4%, compared with the reference. Conclusion: SUVmax was variable and overestimated as the scan time decreased and the sphere size increased. In contrast, SUVpeak was a more robust and accurate metric than SUVmax. The measurements of SUVpeak (or SUVpeak normalized to lean body mass) in addition to SUVmax are desirable for reproducible and accurate quantification in clinical situations.
引用
收藏
页码:222 / 226
页数:5
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   A Systematic Review of the Factors Affecting Accuracy of SUV Measurements [J].
Adams, Michael C. ;
Turkington, Timothy G. ;
Wilson, Joshua M. ;
Wong, Terence Z. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 195 (02) :310-320
[2]  
Boellaard R, 2004, J NUCL MED, V45, P1519
[3]   FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0 [J].
Boellaard, Ronald ;
O'Doherty, Mike J. ;
Weber, Wolfgang A. ;
Mottaghy, Felix M. ;
Lonsdale, Markus N. ;
Stroobants, Sigrid G. ;
Oyen, Wim J. G. ;
Kotzerke, Joerg ;
Hoekstra, Otto S. ;
Pruim, Jan ;
Marsden, Paul K. ;
Tatsch, Klaus ;
Hoekstra, Corneline J. ;
Visser, Eric P. ;
Arends, Bertjan ;
Verzijlbergen, Fred J. ;
Zijlstra, Josee M. ;
Comans, Emile F. I. ;
Lammertsma, Adriaan A. ;
Paans, Anne M. ;
Willemsen, Antoon T. ;
Beyer, Thomas ;
Bockisch, Andreas ;
Schaefer-Prokop, Cornelia ;
Delbeke, Dominique ;
Baum, Richard P. ;
Chiti, Arturo ;
Krause, Bernd J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2010, 37 (01) :181-200
[4]   Standards for PET Image Acquisition and Quantitative Data Analysis [J].
Boellaard, Ronald .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2009, 50 :11S-20S
[5]   Impact of acquisition geometry, image processing, and patient size on lesion detection in whole-body 18F-FDG PET [J].
El Fakhri, Georges ;
Santos, Paula A. ;
Badawi, Ramsey D. ;
Holdsworth, Clay H. ;
Van den Abbeele, Annick D. ;
Kijewski, Marie Foley .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2007, 48 (12) :1951-1960
[6]   Preoperative Staging of Lung Cancer with Combined PET-CT. [J].
Fischer, Barbara ;
Lassen, Ulrik ;
Mortensen, Jann ;
Larsen, Soren ;
Loft, Annika ;
Bertelsen, Anne ;
Ravn, Jesper ;
Clementsen, Paul ;
Hogholm, Asbjorn ;
Larsen, Klaus ;
Rasmussen, Torben ;
Keiding, Susanne ;
Dirksen, Asger ;
Gerke, Oke ;
Skov, Birgit ;
Steffensen, Ida ;
Hansen, Hanne ;
Vilmann, Peter ;
Jacobsen, Grete ;
Backer, Vibeke ;
Maltbaek, Niels ;
Pedersen, Jesper ;
Madsen, Henrik ;
Nielsen, Henrik ;
Hojgaard, Liselotte .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 361 (01) :32-39
[7]   Japanese guideline for the oncology FDG-PET/CT data acquisition protocol: synopsis of Version 2.0 [J].
Fukukita, Hiroyoshi ;
Suzuki, Kazufumi ;
Matsumoto, Keiichi ;
Terauchi, Takashi ;
Daisaki, Hiromitsu ;
Ikari, Yasuhiko ;
Shimada, Naoki ;
Senda, Michio .
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 28 (07) :693-705
[8]   The Clinical Trials Network of the Society of Nuclear Medicine [J].
Graham, Michael M. .
SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2010, 40 (05) :327-331
[9]  
Halpern BS, 2005, J NUCL MED, V46, P603
[10]  
Halpern BS, 2004, J NUCL MED, V45, P797