Teams in organizations: a review on team effectiveness

被引:50
作者
Delgado Pina, Maria Isabel [1 ,2 ]
Romero Martinez, Ana Maria [1 ]
Gomez Martinez, Luis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Dept Business Adm, Management, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Business Adm, Dept Business Adm, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Team working; Measurement;
D O I
10.1108/13527590810860177
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review the research on organizational teams. The aim is delimiting the conceptual space of effectiveness and determining team-level measurement issues. Design/methodology/approach - A range of published works, which analyse the different variables of effectiveness for each type of team, is reviewed (the most used effectiveness criteria are shown in a table). According to the existence of different types of teams - work team, parallel team, project team and management team - the authors assess what variables and measures are more appropriate according to team type, analyse the problems in gathering data and measuring in this level of analysis and, finally, offer a proposal of measurement issues for future research. Findings - The authors conclude that effectiveness is a multidimensional concept with three dimensions: performance, attitudinal outcomes, and behavioural outcomes. Regarding team-level measurement issues, the authors also conclude that there is a need to use multiple data sources and multimethod analyses incorporating consensus and aggregation methods, as well as observation and key informants. Practical implications - The results of this work can support future research on teams. Although considerable headway has been made in the team effectiveness studies, there are things that still need to be done. The paper shows that a more complete measure of effectiveness must be developed, according to the three dimensions: performance, attitudinal outcomes, and behavioural outcomes. Originality/value - The paper is a comprehensive review and provides a basis for researchers in the area of effective teams.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / +
页数:17
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   Interdependence and controversy in group decision making: Antecedents to effective self-managing teams [J].
Alper, S ;
Tjosvold, D ;
Law, KS .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1998, 74 (01) :33-52
[2]  
Amason AC, 1996, ACAD MANAGE J, V39, P123, DOI 10.2307/256633
[3]   RESOLVING THE PARADOX OF CONFLICT, STRATEGIC DECISION-MAKING, AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE [J].
AMASON, AC ;
SCHWEIGER, DM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENT, 1994, 5 (03) :239-253
[4]  
APPELBAUM SH, 2007, J AM ACAD BUSINESS, V10, P36
[5]  
Baldwin TT, 1997, ACAD MANAGE J, V40, P1369, DOI 10.2307/257037
[6]   Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects [J].
Bunderson, JS ;
Sutcliffe, KM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2002, 45 (05) :875-893
[7]   RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS - IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS [J].
CAMPION, MA ;
MEDSKER, GJ ;
HIGGS, AC .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 46 (04) :823-850
[8]   Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension [J].
Campion, MA ;
Papper, EM ;
Medsker, GJ .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 49 (02) :429-452
[9]   What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite [J].
Cohen, SG ;
Bailey, DE .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1997, 23 (03) :239-290
[10]   A predictive model of self-managing work team effectiveness [J].
Cohen, SG ;
Ledford, GE ;
Spreitzer, GM .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 1996, 49 (05) :643-676