Revision process of and expert committee composition for Korean national cancer screening guideline

被引:1
作者
Kim, Yeol [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Won-Chul [3 ]
Kim, Soo Young [4 ]
Seo, Hong Gwan [2 ]
Lee, Dukhyoung [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Canc Control Inst, Goyang, South Korea
[2] Natl Canc Ctr, Ctr Canc Detect & Prevent, Goyang, South Korea
[3] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Dept Prevent Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Hallym Univ, Coll Med, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hosp, Dept Family Med, Seoul, South Korea
来源
JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2015年 / 58卷 / 04期
关键词
Early detection of cancer; Guideline; Process; Evidence; Committee;
D O I
10.5124/jkma.2015.58.4.277
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Cancer screening is one of the most effective methods for cancer control. The national cancer screening program has provided regular cancer screenings for all people at a certain age, regardless of symptoms. This program covers five major cancers: stomach, colorectal, liver, breast, and cervical cancer. Recently, a research project was performed to develop and revise the guidelines for cancer screening, based on the assessment of effectiveness compared to harm and on the evidence from a systematic review of related studies. Target cancers for screening guideline are not only for five major cancers which are included in national cancer screening program, but also for thyroid cancer and lung cancer, because thyroid cancer is rapidly increased recently and lung cancer has the highest mortality rate among cancers. Multidisciplinary expert committees were composed for developing and revising the guidelines for cancer screening. This process of national cancer screening guideline development and revision comprised three steps. First, an expert committee developed key questions for consideration in revision and development of the guidelines. A systematic literature review related to these key questions was performed. In the second step, the effectiveness of the national cancer screening program for five major cancers was analyzed, including analysis of screening rates, early cancer detection rates, and mortality reduction effects. Through this process, a draft of the revised guidelines was created. The draft was open to the public to gather external expert opinions. After review of the expert opinions, the final guidelines for cancer screening were published. In the third step, based on the revised cancer screening guideline, the national cancer screening program will be modified. In this step, cost-effectiveness and feasibility of the revised guideline will be considered.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 283
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Users' guides to the medical literature - XVII. How to use guidelines and recommendations about screening
    Barratt, A
    Irwig, L
    Glasziou, P
    Cumming, RG
    Raffle, A
    Hicks, N
    Gray, JAM
    Guyatt, GH
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 281 (21): : 2029 - 2034
  • [2] Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care, 2015, APPR GUID
  • [3] Cancer Australia, 2015, AUSTR POP HLTH DEV P
  • [4] Evidence-based policy recommendations on cancer screening and prevention
    Franco, EL
    Duarte-Franco, E
    Rohan, TE
    [J]. CANCER DETECTION AND PREVENTION, 2002, 26 (05): : 350 - 361
  • [5] The standardized development method of the Japanese guidelines for cancer screening
    Hamashima, Chisato
    Saito, Hiroshi
    Nakayama, Tornio
    Nakayama, Takeo
    Sobue, Tomotaka
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 38 (04) : 288 - 295
  • [6] Prevalence of financial conflicts of interest among panel members producing clinical practice guidelines in Canada and United States: cross sectional study
    Neuman, Jennifer
    Korenstein, Deborah
    Ross, Joseph S.
    Keyhani, Salomeh
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 343
  • [7] Update on the Methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: Insufficient Evidence
    Petitti, Diana B.
    Teutsch, Steven M.
    Barton, Mary B.
    Sawaya, George F.
    Ockene, Judith K.
    DeWitt, Thomas
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 150 (03) : 199 - +
  • [8] Raffle A, 2007, SCREENING EVIDENCE P
  • [9] UK National Screening Committee, 2015, UK SCREEN PORT
  • [10] Formatting modifications in GRADE evidence profiles improved guideline panelists comprehension and accessibility to information. A randomized trial
    Vandvik, Per Olav
    Santesso, Nancy
    Akl, Elie A.
    You, John
    Mulla, Sohail
    Spencer, Frederick A.
    Johnston, Bradley C.
    Brozek, Jan
    Kreis, Julia
    Brandt, Linn
    Zhou, Qi
    Schuenemann, Holger J.
    Guyatt, Gordon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 65 (07) : 748 - 755