COMPARISON OF DEXAMETHASONE AND ONDANSETRON IN THE PROPHYLAXIS OF EMESIS INDUCED BY MODERATELY EMETOGENIC CHEMOTHERAPY

被引:186
作者
JONES, AL
HILL, AS
SOUKOP, M
HUTCHEON, AW
CASSIDY, J
KAYE, SB
SIKORA, K
CARNEY, DN
CUNNINGHAM, D
机构
[1] INST CANC RES,MED SECT,SUTTON SM2 5PT,SURREY,ENGLAND
[2] BEATSON ONCOL CTR,GLASGOW,SCOTLAND
[3] MATER HOSP,DEPT MED ONCOL,DUBLIN,IRELAND
[4] HAMMERSMITH HOSP,DEPT CLIN ONCOL,LONDON W12 0HS,ENGLAND
[5] ABERDEEN ROYAL INFIRM,ABERDEEN AB9 2ZB,SCOTLAND
[6] GLASGOW ROYAL INFIRM,DEPT MED ONCOL,GLASGOW G4 0SF,SCOTLAND
[7] ROYAL MARSDEN HOSP,SUTTON SM2 5PT,SURREY,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0140-6736(91)90554-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, cross-over trial was done to compare the efficacy and safety of a serotonin receptor antagonist - ondansetron - and dexamethasone in the prophylaxis of acute and delayed emesis and nausea induced by moderately emetogenic non-platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens. Patients were treated as outpatients and received intravenous ondansetron 4 mg or dexamethasone 8 mg before chemotherapy and oral maintenance (ondansetron 4 mg every 6 h and dexamethasone reducing from 4 mg to 1 mg 6-hourly between days 1 and 5) for 5 days. 112 patients were treated (38 men, 73 women, 1 with no gender recorded; age range 30-73 years) and 100 were evaluable for cross-over analysis. Patients taking ondansetron or dexamethasone reported no significant difference in complete and major control of acute (83% vs 79%, p = 0.46) or delayed (82% vs 88%, p = 0.214) emesis (vomiting plus retches). Significantly more patients on dexamethasone (87%) than on ondansetron (72%) reported control of delayed nausea (days 2-5) (p = 0.003). Both drugs were well tolerated with no significant difference in the number of adverse events, and this is reflected by similar patient preference for ondansetron (40%) and dexamethasone (30%) (p = 0.244). Both drugs offer adequate out-patient control of chemotherapy-induced emesis; however, dexamethasone has an advantage in the control of delayed nausea, and also in terms of cost and resource allocation.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 487
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
AAPRO M, 1983, J CLIN ONCOL, V2, P466
[2]   ON THE RECEIVING END PATIENT PERCEPTION OF THE SIDE-EFFECTS OF CANCER-CHEMOTHERAPY [J].
COATES, A ;
ABRAHAM, S ;
KAYE, SB ;
SOWERBUTTS, T ;
FREWIN, C ;
FOX, RM ;
TATTERSALL, MHN .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER & CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1983, 19 (02) :203-208
[3]   EFFICACY OF ONDANSETRON (GR-38032F) AND THE ROLE OF SEROTONIN IN CISPLATIN-INDUCED NAUSEA AND VOMITING [J].
CUBEDDU, LX ;
HOFFMANN, IS ;
FUENMAYOR, NT ;
FINN, AL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1990, 322 (12) :810-816
[4]   COMPARISON OF ANTIEMETIC EFFICACY OF DOMPERIDONE, METOCLOPRAMIDE, AND DEXAMETHASONE IN PATIENTS RECEIVING OUTPATIENT CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMENS [J].
CUNNINGHAM, D ;
EVANS, C ;
GAZET, JC ;
FORD, H ;
POPLE, A ;
DEARLING, J ;
CHAPPELL, D ;
COOMBES, C .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1987, 295 (6592) :250-250
[5]   PREVENTION OF EMESIS IN PATIENTS RECEIVING CYTOTOXIC DRUGS BY GR38032F, A SELECTIVE 5-HT3 RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST [J].
CUNNINGHAM, D ;
POPLE, A ;
FORD, HT ;
HAWTHORN, J ;
GAZET, JC ;
CHALLONER, T ;
COOMBES, RC .
LANCET, 1987, 1 (8548) :1461-1463
[6]  
CUNNINGHAM D, 1989, LANCET, V1, P1323
[7]  
DRAPKIN RL, 1982, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V1, pC236
[8]  
EISMAN JA, 1986, CONCURRENT THERAPY, V27, P42
[9]   DEXAMETHASONE CAN POTENTIATE THE ANTI-EMETIC ACTION OF A 5HT3 RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST ON CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE INDUCED VOMITING IN THE FERRET [J].
HAWTHORN, J ;
CUNNINGHAM, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1990, 61 (01) :56-60
[10]   GR-38032F (GR-C507/75) - A NOVEL COMPOUND EFFECTIVE IN THE PREVENTION OF ACUTE CISPLATIN-INDUCED EMESIS [J].
HESKETH, PJ ;
MURPHY, WK ;
LESTER, EP ;
GANDARA, DR ;
KHOJASTEH, A ;
TAPAZOGLOU, E ;
SARTIANO, GP ;
WHITE, DR ;
WERNER, K ;
CHUBB, JM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1989, 7 (06) :700-705