IMPORTANCE OF PROTON SUPPLY AND CALCIUM-SINK SIZE IN THE DISSOLUTION OF PHOSPHATE ROCK MATERIALS OF DIFFERENT REACTIVITY IN SOIL

被引:33
作者
ROBINSON, JS [1 ]
SYERS, JK [1 ]
BOLAN, NS [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE,DEPT AGR & ENVIRONM SCI,NEWCASTLE TYNE NE1 7RU,TYNE & WEAR,ENGLAND
来源
JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE | 1992年 / 43卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2389.1992.tb00151.x
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
The dissolution of a range of phosphate rock (PR) materials (Gafsa, GPR; Jordan, JPR; North Florida, NFPR; and Tundulu, TPR) was evaluated in three UK soils (Nercwys, Davidstow and Withnell) which differed in proton supply and P-buffer capacity. The Ca-sink size was adjusted by adding different amounts of a cation-exchange resin (CER) to the soils. In the presence of a large proton supply (pH(w) 3.8-4.8, pH-buffer capacity 52.5-36.5 mmol OH- kg-1 pH unit-1), the dissolution of GPR, JPR and NFPR in the Nercwys and Davidstow soil-CER mixtures was strongly influenced by the size of the Ca sink. A twofold increase in Ca-sink size in these two soils caused an increase in PR dissolution of 44-120%. Except for TPR, the increase in PR dissolution per unit increase in Ca-sink size was the same for the three PR materials. In the Withnell soil-CER mixtures, where the initial proton supply was relatively small (pH(w) 4.8-6.1, pH-buffer capacity 23.7-21.4 mmol OH- kg-1 pH unit-1), the increase in PR dissolution with increasing Ca-sink size was less (24-68%) than in the other two soils (44-120%). Also, for the Withnell soil, the increase in PR dissolution with increasing Ca-sink size decreased in the order GPR (68%) > JPR (49%)> NFPR (24%), a trend consistent with the decrease in PR reactivity. The maximum dissolution of TPR was only 8-22% under favourable conditions of proton supply and Ca sink, and was little affected by Ca-sink size.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 459
页数:13
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   PHOSPHATE ROCK DISSOLUTION IN SOIL - INDICATIONS FROM PLANT-GROWTH STUDIES [J].
ANDERSON, DL ;
KUSSOW, WR ;
COREY, RB .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1985, 49 (04) :918-925
[2]  
APPLETON JD, 1990, GEOSCIENCES DEV, P181
[3]   A REVIEW OF THE USE OF PHOSPHATE ROCKS AS FERTILIZERS FOR DIRECT APPLICATION IN AUSTRALIA AND NEW-ZEALAND [J].
BOLAN, NS ;
WHITE, RE ;
HEDLEY, MJ .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1990, 30 (02) :297-313
[4]   INFLUENCE OF MANUFACTURING VARIABLES ON CHARACTERISTICS AND THE AGRONOMIC VALUE OF PARTIALLY ACIDULATED PHOSPHATE FERTILIZERS [J].
BOLAN, NS ;
HEDLEY, MJ ;
HARRISON, R ;
BRAITHWAITE, AC .
FERTILIZER RESEARCH, 1990, 26 (1-3) :119-138
[5]  
Bower C.A, 1965, METHODS SOIL ANAL, P933, DOI DOI 10.2134/AGRONMONOGR9.2.C11
[6]   THERMODYNAMIC CONSIDERATIONS ON SOLUBILITY OF PHOSPHATE ROCK [J].
CHIEN, SH .
SOIL SCIENCE, 1977, 123 (02) :117-121
[7]   DISSOLUTION RATES OF PHOSPHATE ROCKS [J].
CHIEN, SH .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1977, 41 (03) :656-657
[8]   COMPARISON OF VARIOUS LABORATORY METHODS FOR PREDICTING THE AGRONOMIC POTENTIAL OF PHOSPHATE ROCKS FOR DIRECT APPLICATION [J].
CHIEN, SH ;
HAMMOND, LL .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1978, 42 (06) :935-939
[9]   THE ROLE OF SOIL-PH IN THE DISSOLUTION OF PHOSPHATE ROCK FERTILIZERS [J].
KANABO, IAK ;
GILKES, RJ .
FERTILIZER RESEARCH, 1987, 12 (02) :165-174
[10]  
Khasawneh F. E., 1978, Advances in Agronomy, V30, P159