DETERMINANTS OF FDI INFLOWS: THE CASE OF RUSSIAN REGIONS

被引:7
作者
Mariev, O. S. [1 ,2 ]
Drapkin, I. M. [1 ,3 ]
Chukavina, K. V. [2 ]
Rachinger, H. [4 ]
机构
[1] Ural Fed Univ, Econ, Grad Sch Econ & Management, 19 Mira Ave, Ekaterinburg 620002, Russia
[2] Ural Fed Univ, Dept Econometr & Stat, Grad Sch Econ & Management, 19 Mira Ave, Ekaterinburg 620002, Russia
[3] Ural Fed Univ, Dept Int Econ, Grad Sch Econ & Management, 19 Mira Ave, Ekaterinburg 620002, Russia
[4] Univ Vienna, Dept Econ, Oskar Morgenstern Pl 1, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
来源
EKONOMIKA REGIONA-ECONOMY OF REGION | 2016年 / 12卷 / 04期
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
foreign direct investment; determinants; gravity approach; Russian regions; Poisson Pseudo Maximum Likelihood method; econometric models; distance to Moscow; gravity variables; remoteness; modernization; foreign direct investment concentration;
D O I
10.17059/2016-4-24
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
This paper empirically analyses the determinants of foreign direct investment inflows into the Russian regions. This problem has become highly relevant for the necessary modernization of the Russian economy after the recent economic slowdown and sharp decrease in budget revenues. The authors model foreign direct investment flows with the use of the gravity approach according to which investment flows are positively correlated with the size of the investor's country as well as the size of the recipient region and are negatively correlated with the distance between investor and recipient. The empirical analysis is based on a constructed database consisting of the foreign direct investment flows from 179 investor countries into 78 Russian regions for the period 2006-2013. The authors apply the Poisson Pseudo Maximum Likelihood method and identify the following factors determining foreign direct investment inflows into the Russian economy: the gross domestic product of the investor's country, the gross domestic product per capita in the recipient region, the distance from the investor to Moscow, the openness of the region, the economic situation in the region, the innovative capacity of the region and the foreign direct investment of the previous period. Interestingly, the distance from the recipient region to Moscow matters for the regions in the western part of Russia (relatively close to Moscow) but is not significant for the regions in the eastern part (remote regions).
引用
收藏
页码:1244 / 1252
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Africano A., 2005, RES WORK PROGR, V174, P1
[2]  
AHREND R, 2000, RUSSIAN EC TRENDS, V9, P26, DOI DOI 10.1111/1467-9426.00114
[3]   Understanding Russian regions' economic performance during periods of decline and growth-An extreme bound analysis approach [J].
Ahrend, Ruediger .
ECONOMIC SYSTEMS, 2012, 36 (03) :426-443
[4]  
Azeem SW, 2012, LOGFORUM, V8, P81
[5]  
Bevan A., 2000, 2638 CEPR, P2
[6]   Agglomeration, adjustment, and state policies in the location of foreign direct investment in the United States [J].
Bobonis, Gustavo J. ;
Shatz, Howard J. .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2007, 89 (01) :30-43
[7]  
Bormann C., 2005, HWWA DISCUSSION PAPE, P1
[8]  
Brainard SL, 1997, AM ECON REV, V87, P520
[9]  
Broadman H., 2001, 2640 WPS WORLD BANK, P1
[10]  
Buccellato T., 2009, EC WORKING PAPERS CT, P1