T-HELPER CELLS IN CYTOTOXIC LYMPHOCYTE-T DEVELOPMENT - ROLE OF L3T4+-DEPENDENT AND L3T4+-INDEPENDENT T-HELPER CELL PATHWAYS IN VIRUS-SPECIFIC AND ALLOREACTIVE CYTOTOXIC LYMPHOCYTE-T - RESPONSES

I have compared the requirements for T helper (Th) cell function during the generation of virus-specific and alloreactive cytotoxic thymus (T)-derived lymphocyte (CTL) responses. Restimulation of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV)-immune T cells (VSV memory CTLs) with VSV-infected stimulators resulted in the generation of class I-restricted, VSV-specific CTLs. Progression of VSV memory CTLs (Lyt-1-2+) into VSV-specific CTLs required inductive signals derived from VSV-induced, Lyt-1+2- Th cells because: (i) cultures depleted by negative selection of Lyt-1+ T cells failed to generate CTLs; (ii) titration of VSV memory CTLs into a limiting dilution (LD) microculture system depleted of Th cells generated curves which were not consistent with a single limiting cell type; (iii) LD analysis of VSV memory CTLs did produce single-hit curves in the presence of Lyt-1+2- T cells sensitized against VSV; and (iv) monoclonal anti-L3T4 antibody completely abrogated CTL generation against VSV. Similar results were also obtained with Sendai virus (SV), a member of the paramyxovirus family. The notion that a class II-restricted, L3T4+ Th cell plays an obligatory role in the generation of CTLs against these viruses is also supported by the observation that purified T cell lymphoblasts (class II antigen negative) failed to function as antigen-presenting cells for CTL responses against VSV and SV. T cell lymphoblasts were efficiently lysed by class I-restricted, anti-VSV and -SV CTLs, indicating that activated T cells expressed the appropriate viral peptides for CTL recognition. Furthermore, heterogeneity in the VSV-induced Th cell population was detected by LD analysis, suggesting that at least two types of Th cells were required for the generation of an anti-VSV CTL response. VSV-induced Th cell function could not simply be replaced by exogenous IL-2 because this lymphokine induced cytotoxic cells that had the characteristics of lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells and not anti-viral CTLs. In contrast, CTL responses against allogeneic determinants could not be completely blocked with antibodies against L3T4 and depletion of L3T4+ cells did not prevent the generation of alloreactive CTLs in cultures stimulated with allogeneic spleen cells or activated T cell lymphoblasts. Thus, these studies demonstrate an obligatory requirement for an L3T4-dependent Th cell pathway for CTL responses against viruses such as VSV and SV; whereas, CTL responses against allogeneic determinants can utilize an L3T4-independent pathway. © 1990.