Updating the opinion related to the revision of Annexes II and III to Council Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market - Residues

被引:1
作者
Culleres, Damia Barcelo
Boesten, Jos
Bolognesi, Claudia
Boobis, Alan
Buechert, Arne
Capri, Ettore
Coggon, David
Hardy, Anthony
Hart, Andy
Koepp, Herbert
Liess, Matthias
Luttik, Robert
Meyer, Otto
Michaelidou-Canna, Stella
Montforts, Mark
Moretto, Angelo
Mueller, Markus
Ossendorp, Bernadette
Steurbaut, Walter
Tasheva, Maria
Vleminckx, Christiane
机构
关键词
annex II and III; data requirements; Directive; 91/414/EEC; plant protection products; pesticides; residues;
D O I
10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1171
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) asked its Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues to review the Opinions of the PPR Panel issued in 2006 and 2007 related to the revision of Annexes II and III to Council Directive 91/414/EEC (data requirements) concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market. The present opinion is an update to the existing opinion on Annex II & III -Residues (EFSA, 2006c). The PPR Panel notes that since the publication of it previous opinion, eight OECD test guidelines and four OECD guidance documents in the field of residues have become available and recommends this new information be thoroughly considered in the establishment of the data requirements in annexes II and III to Directive 91/414/EC. Moreover, when the new Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the placing of plant protection products on the market is in place, it may again be necessary to define additional requirements to address certain issues e.g. pesticides which may disrupt the endocrine system, safeners and synergists, co-formulants. In addition, the PPR Panel cannot at present give a definitive statement on whether or not the data requirements given in Annex II and III are sufficient to gauge risks of nanopesticides, since such an assessment would require substantial scientific efforts and time which could not be provided within the frame of the present mandate. The PPR Panel emphasises that the recommendations in its previous opinion still stand.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 4 条
[1]   The Potential Risks Arising from Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies on Food and Feed Safety [J].
Barlow, Sue ;
Chesson, Andrew ;
Collins, John D. ;
Flynn, Albert ;
Hardy, Anthony ;
Jany, Klaus -Dieter ;
Knaap, Ada ;
Kuiper, Harry ;
Larsen, John Christian ;
Le Neindre, Pierre ;
Schans, Jan ;
Schlatter, Josef ;
Silano, Vittorio ;
Skerfving, Staffan ;
Vannier, Philippe .
EFSA JOURNAL, 2009, 7 (03)
[2]  
EFSA(European Food Safety Authority), 2008, US PROB METH MOD DIE
[3]  
EFSA(European Food Safety Authority), 2008, SCI OP PAN PLANT PRO
[4]  
OECD(Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development), DOCUMENTS