IDENTITY OF THE WORK OF ART

被引:0
作者
Ristic, Stefan
机构
来源
PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIETY-FILOZOFIJA I DRUSTVO | 2010年 / 21卷 / 02期
关键词
work of art; fake and forgery; autographic and allographic arts; aesthetic features of the object; notation; type and token;
D O I
10.2298/FID1002293R
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
The paper intends to determine the identity of the work of art in visual arts, music and literature. The discussion is of ontological nature. Particular attention is given to the problem of imitation of works of art in different arts, making a distinction between two types of imitation: fakes and forgeries. The first type is found only within the arts where the work of art is a singular physical object, i.e. with the so called autographic arts, whereas the second type can also be found in other, allographic arts, although less commonly. The problem of the imitation of works of art is closely related with the issue concerning the possibility of reducing the work of art to a formal symbolic system which would serve as a definition of the work of art. The discussion shows that a consistent analysis of the ontological status of the work of art in different art forms provides results that may seem at the first glance unintuitive and surprising.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 308
页数:16
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Birger Peter, 1998, TEORIJA AVANGARDE
[2]   Can a musical work be created? [J].
Caplan, B ;
Matheson, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF AESTHETICS, 2004, 44 (02) :113-134
[3]  
Carroll Noel, 2009, PHILOS ART CONT INTR
[4]  
Currie G, 2004, ARTS AND MINDS
[5]  
Danto A., 1995, END ART CONT ART PAL
[6]  
Davies David, 2004, ART AS PERFORMANCE
[7]  
Dickie George., 2001, ART VALUE
[8]   Musical works as eternal types (Jerrold Levinson's study on music, art and metaphysics) [J].
Dodd, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF AESTHETICS, 2000, 40 (04) :424-440
[9]  
Goodman N., 1999, LANGUAGES ART
[10]  
Kivy P., 2006, PERFORMANCE READING