Spatial priorities for freshwater biodiversity conservation in light of catchment protection and connectivity in Europe

被引:0
作者
Szabolcs, Marton [1 ]
Kapusi, Felicia [1 ]
Carrizo, Savrina [2 ]
Markovic, Danijela [3 ]
Freyhof, Joerg [4 ]
Cid, Nuria [5 ]
Cardoso, Ana Cristina [6 ]
Scholz, Mathias [7 ]
Kasperidus, Hans D. [7 ]
Darwall, William R. T. [2 ]
Lengyel, Szabolcs [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Ecol Res, Inst Aquat Ecol, Dept Tisza Res, ELKH, Debrecen, Hungary
[2] Int Union Conservat Nat, Global Species Programme, Freshwater Biodivers Unit, Cambridge, England
[3] Osnabruck Univ Appl Sci, Osnabruck, Germany
[4] German Ctr Integrat Biodivers Res iDiv, Leipzig, Germany
[5] Univ Barcelona, Fac Biol, Dept Ecol, Barcelona, Spain
[6] European Commiss, Inst Environm & Sustainabil, Water Resources Unit, Joint Res Ctr, Ispra, Italy
[7] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Conservat Biol, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Freshwater ecosystems host disproportionately high numbers of species relative to their surface area yet are poorly protected globally. We used data on the distribution of 1631 species of aquatic plant, mollusc, odonate and fish in 18,816 river and lake catchments in Europe to establish spatial conservation priorities based on the occurrence of threatened, range-restricted and endemic species using the Marxan systematic conservation planning tool. We found that priorities were highest for rivers and ancient lakes in S Europe, large rivers and lakes in E and N Europe, smaller lakes in NW Europe and karst/limestone areas in the Balkans, S France and central Europe. The a priori inclusion of well-protected catchments resulted in geographically more balanced priorities and better coverage of threatened (critically endangered, endangered and vulnerable) species. The a priori exclusion of well-protected catchments showed that priority areas that need further conservation interventions are in S and E Europe. We developed three ways to evaluate the correspondence between conservation priority and current protection by assessing whether a cathment has more (or less) priority given its protection level relative to all other catchments. Each method found that priority relative to protection was high in S and E Europe and generally low in NW Europe. The inclusion of hydrological connectivity had little influence on these patterns but decreased the coverage of threatened species, indicating a trade-off between connectivity and conservation of threatened species. Our results suggest that catchments in S and E Europe need urgent conservation attention (protected areas, restoration, management, species protection) in the face of imminent threats such as river regulation, dam construction, hydropower development and climate change. Our study presents continental-scale conservation priorities for freshwater ecosystems in ecologically meaningful planning units and will thus be important in freshwater biodiversity conservation policy and practice, and water management in Europe.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Freshwater ecoregions of the world:: A new map of biogeographic units for freshwater biodiversity conservation [J].
Abell, Robin ;
Thieme, Michele L. ;
Revenga, Carmen ;
Bryer, Mark ;
Kottelat, Maurice ;
Bogutskaya, Nina ;
Coad, Brian ;
Mandrak, Nick ;
Balderas, Salvador Contreras ;
Bussing, William ;
Stiassny, Melanie L. J. ;
Skelton, Paul ;
Allen, Gerald R. ;
Unmack, Peter ;
Naseka, Alexander ;
Ng, Rebecca ;
Sindorf, Nikolai ;
Robertson, James ;
Armijo, Eric ;
Higgins, Jonathan V. ;
Heibel, Thomas J. ;
Wikramanayake, Eric ;
Olson, David ;
Lopez, Hugo L. ;
Reis, Roberto E. ;
Lundberg, John G. ;
Perez, Mark H. Sabaj ;
Petry, Paulo .
BIOSCIENCE, 2008, 58 (05) :403-414
[2]   Unlocking the potential of protected areas for freshwaters [J].
Abell, Robin ;
Allan, J. David ;
Lehner, Bernhard .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2007, 134 (01) :48-63
[3]   Effectiveness of protected area networks in representing freshwater biodiversity:: the case of a Mediterranean river basin (south-eastern Spain) [J].
Abellan, Pedro ;
Sanchez-Fernandez, David ;
Velasco, Josefa ;
Millan, Andres .
AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2007, 17 (04) :361-374
[4]   Landscapes and riverscapes: The influence of land use on stream ecosystems [J].
Allan, JD .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND SYSTEMATICS, 2004, 35 :257-284
[5]  
American Fisheries Society (AFS), 2020, STAT WORLD AQ SCI SO
[6]  
Amori G, 2016, IUCN RED LIST THREAT, DOI [DOI 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-2.RLTS.T41475A22322352.EN, 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T22728245A90341807.en]
[7]  
Ardron JA, 2008, MARXAN GOOD PRACTICE, DOI [10.1136/jnnp.2007.126045, DOI 10.1136/JNNP.2007.126045]
[8]   Species History Masks the Effects of Human-Induced Range Loss - Unexpected Genetic Diversity in the Endangered Giant Mayfly Palingenia longicauda [J].
Balint, Miklos ;
Malnas, Kristof ;
Nowak, Carsten ;
Geismar, Jutta ;
Vancsa, Eva ;
Polyak, Laszlo ;
Lengyel, Szabolcs ;
Haase, Peter .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (03)
[9]  
BALL IR, 2009, SPATIAL CONSERVATION, P185, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.CJCA.2015.05.027
[10]  
Biofresh, 2013, FRESHW INF PLATF