COOPERATIVE RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT IN GOVERNMENT LABORATORIES - COMPARING THE UNITED-STATES AND JAPAN

被引:9
作者
BOZEMAN, B
PANDEY, S
机构
[1] School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, D.M. Smith Building
[2] Center for Technology and Information Policy, The Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse
[3] L.C. Smith College of Engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0166-4972(94)90052-3
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Cooperative technology policy activities of US and Japanese government laboratories are compared to determine the extent, structural patterns, motives, and consequences of cooperative R&D. Based on survey data from US federal laboratories and Japanese national laboratories, the study shows that government laboratories of the respective nations are quite similar with regard to laboratory missions and motives for cooperative R&D. But the labs' cooperative R&D activities diverge in several ways. First, compared to Japanese government labs, US government labs have, on average, more than twice as many cooperative R&D agreements. However, Japanese labs have a higher percentage of agreements with industry and nonprofit organizations, and with foreign organizations. US laboratories with a larger number of cooperative R&D agreements have a larger number of patents and somewhat higher ratings of technology transfer effectiveness. Japanese labs with a larger number of R&D agreements also have more patents but lower ratings of technology transfer effectiveness. Finally, lab directors in the US and Japan diverge considerably in their assessments of the contribution of cooperative R&D to the effectiveness of various lab research missions.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 159
页数:15
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Kearns, Federal labs teem with R&D opportunities, Chemical Engineering, 97, 4, pp. 131-137, (1990)
  • [2] Krieger, Cooperation key to US technology remaining competitive, Chemical and Engineering News, (1987)
  • [3] Werner, Bremer, Hard lessons in cooperative research, Issues in Science and Technology, pp. 44-49, (1991)
  • [4] Schriesheim, Toward a golden age for technology transfer, Issues in Science and Technology, (1991)
  • [5] National Science Board, Science and Engineering Indicators — 1989, (1989)
  • [6] Niwa, Tomizawa, Hirahara, Kakizaki, Camargo, The Japanese Science and Technology Indicator System, (1991)
  • [7] White House Science Council, Report of the Federal Laboratory Review Panel, (1983)
  • [8] Conference Board, Getting More out of Science and Technology, Research Report No. 904, (1987)
  • [9] MIT Commission on Industrial Productivity, Made in America: Regaining the Competitive Edge, (1989)
  • [10] President's Commission on Industrial Competitiveness, Global Competition: The New Reality, (1985)