AN ASSESSMENT OF THE NGUYEN AND PINDER METHOD FOR SLUG TEST ANALYSIS

被引：4

作者：

BUTLER, JJ

HYDER, Z

机构：

来源：

GROUND WATER MONITORING AND REMEDIATION | 1994年 / 14卷 / 04期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1111/j.1745-6592.1994.tb00490.x

中图分类号：

TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];

学科分类号：

081501 ;

摘要：

The Nguyen and Pinder method is one of four techniques commonly used for analysis of response data from slug tests. Limited field research has raised questions about the reliability of the parameter estimates obtained with this method. A theoretical evaluation of this technique reveals that errors were made in the derivation of the analytical solution upon which the technique is based. Simulation and field examples show that the errors result in parameter estimates that can differ from actual values by orders of magnitude. These findings indicate that the Nguyen and Pinder method should no longer be a tool in the repetoire of the field hydrogeologist. If data from a slug test performed in a partially penetrating well in a confined aquifer need to be analyzed, recent work has shown that the Hvorslev method is the best alternative among the commonly used techniques.

引用

页码：124 / 131

页数：8

共 24 条

[1]

Bohling G.C., McElwee C.D., SUPRPUMP: An interactive program for well test analysis and design, Ground Water, 30, 2, pp. 262-268, (1992)

[2]

Bouwer H., The Bouwer and Rice slug test — An update, Ground Water, 27, 3, pp. 304-309, (1989)

[3]

Bouwer H., Rice R.C., A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells, Water Resour. Res, 12, 3, pp. 423-428, (1976)

[4]

Brother M.R., Christians G.L., In situ slug test analysis: A comparison of three popular methods for unconfined aquifers, Proc. of the 7th national outdoor action conf, pp. 597-607, (1993)

[5]

Butler J.J., Liu W.Z., Pumping tests in nonuni‐ form aquifers: The radially asymmetric case, Water Resour. Res, 29, 2, pp. 259-269, (1993)

[6]

Butler J.J., Liu W.Z., Analysis of 1991–1992 slug tests in the Dakota aquifer of central and western Kansas. Open‐File Rept. 93–1c, (1994)

[7]

Butler J.J., Bohling G.C., Hyder Z., McElwee CD., The use of slug tests to describe vertical variations in hydraulic conductivity, Jour. of Hydrology, 156, pp. 137-162, (1994)

[8]

Butler J.J., McElwee C.D., Hyder Z., Slug tests in unconfined aquifers. Contribution No. 303, (1993)

[9]

Campbell M.D., Starrett M.S., Fowler J.D., Klein JJ., Slug tests and hydraulic conductivity, Proc. of the petroleum hydrocarbons and organic chemicals in ground water: Prevention, detection, and restoration conf, pp. 85-99, (1990)

[10]

Chirlin G.R., A critique of the Hvorslev method for slug test analysis: The fully penetrating well, Ground Water Monitoring & Remediation, 9, 2, pp. 130-138, (1989)

← 1 2 3 →