Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus buchneri (DSM 16774) as a silage additive for all species

被引:3
作者
不详
机构
关键词
Technological additive; silage additive; Lactobacillus buchneri; QPS; safety; efficacy;
D O I
10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2359
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Lactobacillus buchneri is a technological additive intended to improve the ensiling process at a proposed dose of 1.0 x 10(8) CFU/kg fresh material. The bacterial species L. buchneri is considered by the European Food Safety Authority to be suitable for the Qualified Presumption of Safety approach. As the identity of the strain has been clearly established and as no concerns relating to antibiotic resistance were identified, the use of the strain in the production of silage is considered safe for livestock species, consumers of products from animals fed the treated silage and for the environment. Evidence of a lack of irritancy was provided for one formulation of the additive. It is unlikely that considering the nature of the alternative food grade excipients, different results would be obtained for other formulations containing this strain of L. buchneri. However, due to the lack of information and its proteinaceous nature, the active agent has the potential to be a skin/respiratory sensitizer. Five studies with laboratory-scale silos are described, each lasting at least 90 days, made using samples of forage covering a range of dry matter content (23 to 69 %) with differing water-soluble carbohydrate content. In each case, replicate silos containing treated forage were compared to identical silos containing the same untreated forage and, after opening, the period before deterioration became evident was measured. The results showed that the additive containing this specific strain of L. buchneri has the potential to improve the production of silage from all forages by increasing acetic acid production resulting in an extended aerobic stability of the treated silage.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 3 条
[1]   Introduction of a Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) approach for assessment of selected microorganisms referred to EFSA [J].
Barlow, Sue ;
Chesson, Andrew ;
Collins, John D. ;
Dybing, Erik ;
Flynn, Albert ;
Fruijtier-Poelloth, Claudia ;
Hardy, Anthony ;
Knaap, Ada ;
Kuiper, Harry ;
Le Neindre, Pierre ;
Schans, Jan ;
Schlatter, Josef ;
Silano, Vittorio ;
Skerfving, Staffan ;
Vannier, Philippe .
EFSA JOURNAL, 2007, 5 (12)
[2]   Technical guidance Update of the criteria used in the assessment of bacterial resistance to antibiotics of human or veterinary importance Prepared by the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed [J].
Bories, Georges ;
Brantom, Paul ;
de Barbera, Joaquim Brufau ;
Chesson, Andrew ;
Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro ;
Debski, Bogdan ;
Dierick, Noel ;
Franklin, Anders ;
Gropp, Juergen ;
Halle, Ingrid ;
Hogstrand, Christer ;
de Knecht, Joop ;
Leng, Lubomir ;
Haldorsen, Anne-Katrine Lundebye ;
Mantovani, Alberto ;
Mezes, Miklos ;
Nebbia, Carlo ;
Rambeck, Walter ;
Rychen, Guido ;
von Wright, Atte ;
Wester, Pieter .
EFSA JOURNAL, 2008, 6 (07)
[3]   Scientific Opinion on the maintenance of the list of QPS biological agents intentionally added to food and feed (2010 update) EFSA on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) [J].
Collins, John Daniel ;
Noerrung, Birgit ;
Budka, Herbert ;
Andreoletti, Olivier ;
Buncic, Sava ;
Griffm, John ;
Hald, Tine ;
Havelaar, Arie ;
Hope, James ;
Klein, Guenter ;
McLauchlin, James ;
Mueller-Graf, Christine ;
Nguyen-The, Christophe ;
Peixe, Luisa ;
Maradona, Miguel Prieto ;
Ricci, Antonia ;
Sofos, John ;
Threlfall, John ;
Vagsholm, Ivar ;
Vanopdenbosch, Emmanuel .
EFSA JOURNAL, 2010, 8 (12)