A consistency assessment of coupled cohesive zone models for mixed-mode debonding problems

被引:30
作者
Dimitri, R. [1 ]
Trullo, M. [1 ]
Zavarise, G. [1 ]
De Lorenzis, L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salento, Dept Innovat Engn, Lecce, Italy
[2] Tech Univ Carolo Wilhelmina Braunschweig, Inst Angew Mech, Braunschweig, Germany
来源
FRATTURA ED INTEGRITA STRUTTURALE | 2014年 / 8卷 / 29期
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Cohesive zone modeling; Contact; Debonding; Thermodynamics;
D O I
10.3221/IGF-ESIS.29.23
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Due to their simplicity, cohesive zone models (CZMs) are very attractive to describe mixed-mode failure and debonding processes of materials and interfaces. Although a large number of coupled CZMs have been proposed, and despite the extensive related literature, little attention has been devoted to ensuring the consistency of these models for mixed-mode conditions, primarily in a thermodynamical sense. A lack of consistency may affect the local or global response of a mechanical system. This contribution deals with the consistency check for some widely used exponential and bilinear mixed-mode CZMs. The coupling effect on stresses and energy dissipation is first investigated and the path-dependance of the mixed-mode debonding work of separation is analitically evaluated. Analytical predictions are also compared with results from numerical implementations, where the interface is described with zero-thickness contact elements. A node-to-segment strategy is here adopted, which incorporates decohesion and contact within a unified framework. A new thermodynamically consistent mixed-mode CZ model based on a reformulation of the Xu-Needleman model as modified by van den Bosch et al. is finally proposed and derived by applying the Coleman and Noll procedure in accordance with the second law of thermodynamics. The model holds monolithically for loading and unloading processes, as well as for decohesion and contact, and its performance is demonstrated through suitable examples.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 283
页数:18
相关论文
共 16 条
[2]   Mode I fracture of adhesive joints using tailored cohesive zone models [J].
Alfano, M. ;
Furgiuele, F. ;
Leonardi, A. ;
Maletta, C. ;
Paulino, G. H. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FRACTURE, 2009, 157 (1-2) :193-204
[3]  
Barenblatt G.I., 1959, J APPL MATH MECH, V23, P622, DOI [10.1016/0021-8928(59)90157-1, DOI 10.1016/0021-8928(59)90157-1]
[4]   Measurement of mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with mixed-mode bending apparatus [J].
Benzeggagh, ML ;
Kenane, M .
COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 56 (04) :439-449
[5]  
Camanho PP, 2003, J COMPOS MATER, V37, P1415, DOI 10.1177/002199803034505
[6]   Some issues in the application of cohesive zone models for metal-ceramic interfaces [J].
Chandra, N ;
Li, H ;
Shet, C ;
Ghonem, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2002, 39 (10) :2827-2855
[7]   YIELDING OF STEEL SHEETS CONTAINING SLITS [J].
DUGDALE, DS .
JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS OF SOLIDS, 1960, 8 (02) :100-104
[8]   Mixed mode cohesive law [J].
Hogberg, J. L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FRACTURE, 2006, 141 (3-4) :549-559
[9]   Potential-based and non-potential-based cohesive zone formulations under mixed-mode separation and over-closure. Part I: Theoretical analysis [J].
McGarry, J. Patrick ;
Mairtin, Eamonn O. ;
Parry, Guillaume ;
Beltz, Glenn E. .
JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS OF SOLIDS, 2014, 63 :336-362
[10]   A thermodynamically and variationally consistent class of damage-type cohesive models [J].
Mosler, J. ;
Scheider, I. .
JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS OF SOLIDS, 2011, 59 (08) :1647-1668