The notion of justice in Adam Smith and Amartya Sen

被引:2
作者
Alean Pico, Augusto [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Colombia, Ciencias Econ, Cartagena, Bolivar, Colombia
[2] Univ Tecnol Bolivar, Fac Econ & Negocios, Cartagena, Bolivar, Colombia
来源
CUADERNOS DE ECONOMIA | 2014年 / 33卷 / 63期
关键词
Justice; rationality; moral sentiment; Adam Smith; Amartya Sen;
D O I
10.15446/cuad.econ.v33n63.45337
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Amartya Sen argues that his notion of justice has its origins in the thinking of Adam Smith. Sen employed, in a very particular way, the concepts of sympathy and the impartial spectator. Beyond the statement of Sen, we are interested in researching whether Smith's notion of justice is compatible with Sen's. The main finding is that there are significant differences between the theories and therefore they are not compatible. Smith emphasized the importance of moral judgment based on sentiment. Conversely Amartya Sen emphasizes the need to use reason and public debate as key elements of a theory of justice.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 379
页数:21
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1822, THEORY MORAL SENTIME
[2]  
Davis J., 2011, MAITREYEE, P3
[3]   The idea of justice. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2009, 468 pp [J].
Gilardone, Muriel .
SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2010, 35 (04) :709-720
[4]  
Gotoh R., 2009, INJUSTICE NEW EC A S
[5]  
Mendez V., 2004, FILOSOFO MERCADER FI
[6]  
Raphael D. D., 2009, IMPARTIAL SPECTATOR
[7]  
RAPHAEL DD, 1973, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V73, P87
[8]  
Rawls John, 1971, TEORIA JUSTICIA, V2a
[9]  
RAWLS John, 1995, LIBERALISMO POLITICO
[10]  
Sen A, 2002, RATIONALITY FREEDOM