Security analysis for temporal role based access control

被引:10
作者
Uzun, Emre [1 ]
Atluri, Vijayalakshmi [1 ]
Vaidya, Jaideep [1 ]
Sural, Shamik [2 ]
Ferrara, Anna [3 ]
Parlato, Gennaro [4 ]
Madhusudan, P. [5 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Newark, NJ 08901 USA
[2] Indian Inst Technol, Kharagpur, W Bengal, India
[3] Univ Bristol, Bristol, Avon, England
[4] Univ Southampton, Southampton, Hants, England
[5] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Access control; temporal RBAC; safety analysis; temporal role hierarchy;
D O I
10.3233/JCS-140510
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Providing restrictive and secure access to resources is a challenging and socially important problem. Among the many formal security models, Role Based Access Control (RBAC) has become the norm in many of today's organizations for enforcing security. For every model, it is necessary to analyze and prove that the corresponding system is secure. Such analysis helps understand the implications of security policies and helps organizations gain confidence on the control they have on resources while providing access, and devise and maintain policies. In this paper, we consider security analysis for the Temporal RBAC (TRBAC), one of the extensions of RBAC. The TRBAC considered in this paper allows temporal restrictions on roles themselves, userpermission assignments (UA), permission-role assignments (PA), as well as role hierarchies (RH). Towards this end, we first propose a suitable administrative model that governs changes to temporal policies. Then we propose our security analysis strategy, that essentially decomposes the temporal security analysis problem into smaller and more manageable RBAC security analysis sub-problems for which the existing RBAC security analysis tools can be employed. We then evaluate them from a practical perspective by evaluating their performance using simulated data sets.
引用
收藏
页码:961 / 996
页数:36
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Aich S, 2007, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V4804, P1567
  • [2] Ammann P. E., 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE Computer Society Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy (Cat. No.91CH2986-8), P87, DOI 10.1109/RISP.1991.130777
  • [3] Atluri V., 2002, ACM Transactions on Information and Systems Security, V5, P62, DOI 10.1145/504909.504912
  • [4] Framework for role-based delegation models
    Barka, E
    Sandhu, R
    [J]. 16TH ANNUAL COMPUTER SECURITY APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 168 - 176
  • [5] Barka E., 2000, P 23 NATL INF SYST S, V4, P49
  • [6] Bertino E., 2001, ACM Transactions on Information and Systems Security, V4, P191, DOI 10.1145/501978.501979
  • [7] Bertino E., 1994, 2nd ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, P126, DOI 10.1145/191177.191202
  • [8] Bradbury J, 1993, P KENTON OLWANDLE C
  • [9] Crampton J, 2006, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V4189, P174
  • [10] FERRAIOLO D, 2001, TISSEC