How Well Do Commonly Used Language Instruments Measure English Oral-Language Proficiency?

被引:15
作者
Pray, Lisa [1 ]
机构
[1] Utah State Univ, Logan, UT 84322 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/15235882.2005.10162841
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This research examines three tests commonly used to assess the English oral-language proficiency of students who are English language learners (ELLs): the Language Assessment Scales-Oral, the Woodcock-Munoz Language Survey, and the IDEA Proficiency Test. These tests were given to native English-speaking non-Hispanic White and Hispanic students from varied socioeconomic levels. Since these tests use native-language proficiency as the standard by which responses are evaluated, it is reasonable to expect native English speakers to perform extremely well on these instruments. The extent to which the native speakers of the language do not perform well on these instruments calls their validity into question. Findings indicated that none of the native English-speaking children who took the Woodcock-Munoz Language Survey scored in the "fluent" or "advanced fluent" English ability. One hundred percent of the students scored in the "fluent English speaking" range of the Language Assessment Scales-Oral, and 87% of the students scored in the "fluent English speaking" range of the IDEA Proficiency Test.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 409
页数:23
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
American Educational Research Association American Psychological Association & National Council on Measurement in Education, 1999, STAND ED PSYCH TEST
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, DEV LANGUAGE
[3]  
Artiles A. J., 2000, MINORITY ED PUBLIC S
[4]   OVERREPRESENTATION OF MINORITY-STUDENTS IN SPECIAL-EDUCATION - A CONTINUING DEBATE [J].
ARTILES, AJ ;
TRENT, SC .
JOURNAL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION, 1994, 27 (04) :410-437
[5]  
Brown R., 1973, 1 LANGUAGE
[6]   CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDATION BY THE MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD MATRIX [J].
CAMPBELL, DT ;
FISKE, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1959, 56 (02) :81-105
[7]  
Crystal D., 1997, CAMBRIDGE ENCY LANGU
[9]  
Cummins J., 2000, LANGUAGE POWER PEDAG
[10]  
Curtiss S., 1996, JOINT INT C ASS LIT