Can just war theory delegitimate terrorism?

被引:4
作者
Sussmann, Naomi [1 ]
机构
[1] ECLA, Platanenstr 24, D-13156 Berlin, Germany
关键词
just-war theory; non-combatants; political violence; state; terrorism;
D O I
10.1177/1474885112464478
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The rapidly expanding literature on terrorism can be seen to respond to the growing incidence of violent political conflict. Most of the relevant discussion is conducted within the framework of just war theory - a theory in which armed conflicts are considered legitimate only when they are explicitly announced and justified; when they take place between states and their armies; and when they are strictly exclusive of non-combatants. This article argues that framing the discussion in these terms is unhelpful: rather than help us to properly consider and delegitimize terrorism, it tends to expose the inadequacy of just war theory itself under conditions of modern violence. The purpose of this article is thus to establish that the framework of just war theory is inadequate to the delegitimation of terrorism. The article concludes by arguing, on these grounds, for the replacement of the theory of just war with a theory of justified political violence.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 446
页数:22
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Kamm F.M., McMahan J., Jeremy Waldron and Michael Walzer
[2]  
Walzer, 1
[3]  
Walzer, The Triumph of Just War Theory (and the Dangers of Success), Social Research, 69, pp. 926-944, (2002)
[4]  
Michael W., Terrorism and Just War, Thinking Politically: Essays In Political Theory, pp. 264-277, (2007)
[5]  
Rodin D., Terrorism without Intention, Ethics, 114, 4, pp. 759-771, (2006)
[6]  
Kamm F.M., Terrorism and Intending Evil, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 36, 2, pp. 157-186, (2008)
[7]  
Waldron J., Terrorism and the Uses of Terror, Journal of Ethics, 8, 1, pp. 5-35, (2004)
[8]  
Goodin R.E., What's Wrong With Terrorism, (2006)
[9]  
Rodin, 5
[10]  
Fotion N., Two Theories of Just War, Philosophia, 34, 1, pp. 53-64, (2006)