MISREPORTS OF VOTE CHOICE IN THE 1988 NES SENATE ELECTION STUDY

[1] ABRAMOWITZ A, 1988, AM POLIT SCI REV, V82, P383

[2] A COMPARISON OF VOTING FOR UNITED-STATES SENATOR AND REPRESENTATIVE IN 1978 [J]. AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1980, 74 (03) : 633 - 640

[3] Aldrich J.H., 1984, QUANTITATIVE APPL SO

[4] Asch S., 1951, GROUPS LEADERSHIP ME

[5] RESPONSE VALIDITY - VOTE REPORT [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1968, 32 (04) : 588 - 606

[6] Erikson Robert S., 1980, POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, V2, P91, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00989757

[7] ERIKSON RS, 1989, C RECONSIDERED

[8] EUBANK RB, 1978, AM J POLIT SCI, V27, P122

[9] THE PRO-INCUMBENT BIAS IN THE 1982 NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1984, 28 (01) : 224 - 230

[10] HERSHEY MR, 1986, C POLICY CHANGE

[1] ABRAMOWITZ A, 1988, AM POLIT SCI REV, V82, P383

[2] A COMPARISON OF VOTING FOR UNITED-STATES SENATOR AND REPRESENTATIVE IN 1978 [J]. AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1980, 74 (03) : 633 - 640

[3] Aldrich J.H., 1984, QUANTITATIVE APPL SO

[4] Asch S., 1951, GROUPS LEADERSHIP ME

[5] RESPONSE VALIDITY - VOTE REPORT [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1968, 32 (04) : 588 - 606

[6] Erikson Robert S., 1980, POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, V2, P91, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00989757

[7] ERIKSON RS, 1989, C RECONSIDERED

[8] EUBANK RB, 1978, AM J POLIT SCI, V27, P122

[9] THE PRO-INCUMBENT BIAS IN THE 1982 NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1984, 28 (01) : 224 - 230

[10] HERSHEY MR, 1986, C POLICY CHANGE