English Language Learners' Perceptions of the Usefulness of Types of Form-Focused Written Feedback

被引:4
作者
Haupt, John [1 ]
Bikowski, Dawn [2 ]
机构
[1] Ohio Univ, Linguist, Athens, OH 45701 USA
[2] Ohio Univ, Dept Linguist, English Language Improvement Program, Athens, OH 45701 USA
来源
WRITING & PEDAGOGY | 2014年 / 6卷 / 02期
关键词
FEEDBACK; WRITING INSTRUCTION; SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING; STUDENT PERCEPTIONS; FORM-FOCUSED;
D O I
10.1558/wap.v6i2.283
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Providing English language learners with effective feedback on their writing is an issue facing many writing teachers. This article focuses on English language learners' perceptions of both direct and indirect form-focused written feedback and how these perceptions might change over time. Forty-two advanced level students in an intensive English program at a large U.S. university participated in two surveys, one at the beginning of the term and one at the end. They were asked to rate and comment on the usefulness of five types of feedback (three indirect and two direct) for the purposes of both text revision and the learning of grammar and writing. Students perceived the feedback types that provide codes, comments, and/or explanations as being more useful overall in text revision than other forms of feedback. Findings indicate that students' perceptions regarding the usefulness of feedback types changed throughout the course. Three areas of feedback that students focused on as their perceptions change are identified, as are reasons why students did or did not value each of the feedback types.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 305
页数:23
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Bitchener J, 2012, WRITTEN CORRECTIVE F
[2]   Evidence in support of written corrective feedback [J].
Bitchener, John .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2008, 17 (02) :102-118
[3]   Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback [J].
Bitchener, John ;
Knoch, Ute .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2010, 19 (04) :207-217
[4]   The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development: A Ten Month Investigation [J].
Bitchener, John ;
Knoch, Ute .
APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2010, 31 (02) :193-214
[5]   The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing [J].
Chandler, J .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2003, 12 (03) :267-296
[6]  
Cohen A. D., 1987, LEARNER STRATEGIES L, P57
[7]   The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context [J].
Ellis, Rod ;
Sheen, Younghee ;
Murakami, Mihoko ;
Takashima, Hide .
SYSTEM, 2008, 36 (03) :353-371
[8]  
Enginarlar H., 1993, SYSTEM, V21, P193, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0346-251X(93)90041-E.EVANS, DOI 10.1016/0346-251X(93)90041-E]
[9]  
Ferris D., 2011, TREATMENT ERROR 2 LA
[10]  
Ferris D.R., 2001, J SECOND LANG WRIT, V10, P161, DOI [10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X, DOI 10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X]