Conflicting liberties. The English Debate from James I to James Harrington

被引:0
作者
Arienzo, Alessandro [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Napoli, Naples, Italy
来源
SCIENZA & POLITICA-PER UNA STORIA DELLE DOTTRINE | 2018年 / 30卷 / 58期
关键词
Liberty/Freedom; Ancient Constitution; Harrington; Levellers; Norman Conquest;
D O I
10.6092/issn.1025-9618/8395
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The political debate surrounding the English revolution shows how rich and complex is the scenery of the English liberties before "modern Liberty". The ancient libertates of the Realm, the religious and commercial liberties, the liberty of the free states, and lastly the just freedom of Levellers and Diggers: all these perspectives intersect and conflict without finding any political or juridical synthesis. On the contrary, the gradual affirmation of the liberty of the moderns is accompanied by instances of political and social equality, with which it has to confront. Starting from the dispute on the "Norman Conquest" up to James Harrington's Oceana, this contribution aims to highlight the extent to which the debate on liberties before "liberalism" was composite, conflictual and characterized by the persistence of instances of equality.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 114
页数:20
相关论文
共 108 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1670, HIST BRITAIN PART ES
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1648, AGREEMENT PEOPLE ENG, P359
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1647, CASE ARMY TULY STATE
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1970, J BRIT STUDIES, V10, P30
  • [5] ARMITAGE D., 1998, MILTON REPUBLICANISM
  • [6] Baccelli L., 2003, CRITICA REPUBBLICANE
  • [7] BACON N., 1647, HIST DISCOURSE UNIFO, P51
  • [8] Baker P, 2012, AGREEMENTS OF THE PEOPLE, THE LEVELLERS, AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS OF THE ENGLISH REVOLUTION, P1, DOI 10.1057/9781137291707
  • [9] Barducci M, 2013, ANGLO ITAL RENAISS, P157
  • [10] BERTHIER J., 2014, J HARRINGTON ANCIENN, P67