CONTINUOUS SPINAL-ANESTHESIA WITH HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE - A DOSE-RESPONSE ANALYSIS

被引:0
|
作者
BURGESS, FW
WOIWOOD, MD
LUTZ, RL
WALZ, EJ
PERKINS, DE
机构
关键词
ANESTHESIA; ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUE; SPINAL; CONTINUOUS; BUPIVACAINE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA) with hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.75% bupivacaine in 8.25% dextrose and water) was administered to 27 adult males for transurethral endoscopic surgery. Patients were randomized to receive either 3.75, 7.5 or 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine in a double-blind fashion. A 20-gauge nylon catheter was inserted at the L3-4 interspace, via an 18-gauge Tuohy-Schliff needle, extending only 2 cm into the subarachnoid space. All patients were placed in the lithotomy position prior to administration of the hyperbaric bupivacaine. Sensory block was assessed by pinprick and perception of a 50-Hz tetanic stimulus at 5, 10 and 20 minutes, then every 20 minutes thereafter. Peak sensory and motor block were obtained by 20 minutes for all dose ranges. Peak sensory levels were T7.1, T5.6 and T3.9 for 3.75, 7.5 and 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine, respectively. Linear regression analysis demonstrated a significant correlation (r = 0.68) between peak sensory level and dose of bupivacaine. Peak sensory level as estimated by pinprick and 50-Hz tetanic stimulus showed excellent correlation (r = 0.99). The role of the subarachnoid catheter in the dispersion and distribution of bupivacaine within the subarachnoid space was studied in a model spinal canal system and compared with the distribution of bupivacaine administered via a standard 25-gauge spinal needle. No significant differences were found in the distribution of bupivacaine with either method of injection. The distribution of hyperbaric bupivacaine within the subarachnoid space appears to be related to baricity but is unrelated to administration via needle or catheter.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 56
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A comparison of spinal anesthesia with low-dose hyperbaric levobupivacaine and hyperbaric bupivacaine for transurethral surgery: a randomized controlled trial
    Erbay, R. Hakan
    Ermumcu, O.
    Hanci, V.
    Atalay, H.
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2010, 76 (12) : 992 - 1001
  • [22] The effects of single-dose intravenous dexmedetomidine on hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia
    Seung Hwan Jung
    Soo Kyung Lee
    Kyung Jee Lim
    Eun Young Park
    Mae Hwa Kang
    Jung Min Lee
    Jae Jun Lee
    Sung Mi Hwang
    Sung Jun Hong
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2013, 27 : 380 - 384
  • [23] The effects of hyperbaric or isobaric bupivacaine on bispectral index in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section
    Jabalameli, Mitra
    Hazegh, Nina
    Gholami, Saeed
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 17 (02): : 176 - 181
  • [24] DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE DEVELOPMENT OF TOLERANCE TO BUPIVACAINE IN EXTRADURAL AND SPINAL-ANESTHESIA IN RABBITS
    GOLOMB, E
    LANGERMAN, L
    BENITA, S
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1993, 71 (03) : 450 - 452
  • [25] EFFECT OF LATE POSTURE CHANGE ON THE LEVEL OF SPINAL-ANESTHESIA WITH PLAIN BUPIVACAINE
    NIEMI, L
    TUOMINEN, M
    PITKANEN, M
    ROSENBERG, PH
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1993, 71 (06) : 807 - 809
  • [26] TEMPORARY BACK AND LEG PAIN AFTER BUPIVACAINE AND MORPHINE SPINAL-ANESTHESIA
    ONG, B
    BAKER, C
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1995, 42 (09): : 805 - 807
  • [27] SPINAL-ANESTHESIA FOR TRANSURETHRAL SURGERY - COMPARISON OF 2-PERCENT LIGNOCAINE WITH HYPERBARIC 0.5-PERCENT BUPIVACAINE
    WILLIAMS, N
    DOYLE, A
    BRIGHOUSE, D
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 75 (01) : 9 - 11
  • [28] A low-dose bupivacaine: A comparison of hyperbaric and hypobaric solutions for unilateral spinal anesthesia
    Kaya, M
    Oguz, S
    Aslan, K
    Kadiogullari, N
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2004, 29 (01) : 17 - 22
  • [30] CONTINUOUS SPINAL-ANESTHESIA VERSUS SINGLE DOSING - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY
    DEANDRES, JA
    FEBRE, E
    BELLVER, J
    BOLINCHES, R
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 12 (02) : 135 - 140